Artificial Intelligence-Driven Virtual Reality Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Recovery in Acute and Subacute Stroke Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorComplejo Asistencial Universitario de León Urgencias

About this trial

Background: Upper limb motor deficits are common after stroke, and early rehabilitation is crucial for functional recovery. Virtual reality (VR) combined with artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential to enhance motor learning, but evidence from randomized controlled trials in acute and subacute hospitalized patients is limited.

Objective: To evaluate whether AI-driven VR rehabilitation in addition to standard care improves upper limb motor recovery compared with standard rehabilitation alone in acute and subacute stroke patients.

Design: Prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial with stratified 1:1 allocation by baseline Fulg Meyer Assessment Score.S Participants: Adults (≥18 years) with confirmed acute or subacute stroke, admitted to the hospital, with upper limb motor déficits.

Intervention: Experimental group will receive standard rehabilitation plus AI-driven VR therapy during hospitalization. Control group will receive standard rehabilitation alone.

Primary Outcome: Change in FM-UE score from baseline to hospital discharge. Secondary Outcomes: VR-derived digital biomarkers, therapy adherence, NIHSS, FM-UE, and Modified Ashworth Scale at each session, and the following baseline and treatment variables: etiology, Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), handedness, stroke lateralization, aphasia, acute reperfusion, reperfusion treatment, days from stroke to start of rehabilitation, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and date of discharge. FM-UE at 1 month post-intervention.

Randomization and Blinding: Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either group, stratified by baseline FM-UE (≤30 vs \>30) to ensure balance between groups for stroke severity. Within each stratum, block randomization will be used. Outcome assessors will be blinded.

Sample Size: 50 patients (25 per group).

Ethics and Registration: Approved by hospital ethics committee. Significance: This trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of AI-driven VR therapy for early upper limb rehabilitation in hospitalized stroke patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults ≥18 years

Confirmed acute or subacute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)

Upper limb motor deficits

Admitted to hospital

Disqualifiers

Moderate to severe cognitive impairment.

Severe global aphasia.

Language barrier.

Visual impairment.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • AI-driven VR rehabilitation therapy

    Device

    AI-drive VR device which improves rehabilitation of upper limb impairment

  • Standard rehabilitation

    Device

    Standard rehabilitation followed by rehabilitation team and physicians

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Receive standard rehabilitationActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Receive standard rehabilitation plus AI-driven VR therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Motor function

Fugl-Meyer Assessment

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Neurological sequelae

NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
2

Dependence in daily activities

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
3

Spasticity

Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
4

Muscle strenght

Medical Research Council (MRC) scale

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Other outcomes

1

Age

Years from birth

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
2

Gender

Sex

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
3

Ethiology of the stroke

TOAST clasification

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
4

Dominant-hemisphere

Handedness

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: