Assessing Performance of a Hepatitis C Emergency Department (HepC-EnD) Screening Tool: IT Integration Process for Electronic Health Record System

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-79
SponsorUniversity of Florida

About this trial

The goal of this observational study is to develop, implement, and evaluate a machine learning algorithm-based Hepatitis C Emergency Department (HepC-EnD) screening tool for use in emergency departments (EDs) to identify patients at high risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. HepC-EnD will be integrated into the University of Florida Health electronic health record (EHR) system as a best practice alert (BPA) pop-up for ED providers, notifying them of patients at high risk for HCV infection and recommending both HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening. Investigators aim to enhance the screening and diagnosis of individuals who may otherwise remain undiagnosed and untreated.

The implementation outcomes (e.g., usability) and effectiveness outcomes (e.g., HCV screening and diagnosis rates) of HepC-EnD targeted screening will be compared with universal screening (FOCUS) and conventional physician-initiated screening programs in EDs.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18-79 years of age

Disqualifiers

< 18 years of age

Medically unstable

Trial population

Patients visiting UF Health emergency departments.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Physician-Initiated Screening (Conventional Screening)

    Other intervention

    Screening for HCV and HIV in patients presenting to the ED occurs when an ED provider initiates screening based on symptoms or clinical judgement. Providers will manually order individual tests in the EHR.

  • FOCUS (Universal Screening)

    Other intervention

    During nurse triage, a FOCUS screening question will appear in the EHR and the patient will be asked to opt-in to HCV and HIV testing. For those who consented, if an ED provider enters a phlebotomy order for any reason in the EHR, a BPA will alert the providers to suggest HCV and HIV testing. The provider can decide to "order" or "do not order" for each test individually. Ordered tests automatically trigger the following in the EHR: HCV antibody with reflex to RNA and HIV 1/2 antigen/antibody with reflex to confirmation. For all patients who received positive test result in the ED, standardized linkage-to-care processes will be performed. These procedures are currently implemented in clinical practice.

  • HepC-EnD (Targeted Screening)

    Other intervention

    HepC-EnD will run in real time once integrated into the hospital's Epic EHR system. When the patient comes to the ED waiting room, a risk score generated from HepC-EnD will be available and determine if the patient is at high risk of HCV infection (\> cutoff risk score). If the patient is determined to be at high risk, a HepC-EnD screening question will appear in the EHR during nurse triage and the patient will be asked will be asked to opt-in to HCV and HIV testing. For those who consented, a BPA will alert the ED provider to suggest HCV and HIV testing. The provider can decide to "order" or "do not order" for each test individually. Ordered tests automatically trigger the following in the EHR: HCV antibody with reflex to RNA and HIV 1/2 antigen/antibody with reflex to confirmation. For all patients who received positive test result in the ED, standardized linkage-to-care processes will be performed.

Treatment groups

6,466 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: UF Jacksonville North ED1 intervention
Group B: UF Jacksonville Downtown ED2 interventions
Group C: UF Gainesville ED2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of new HCV or HIV diagnoses

Proportion of positive results among performed tests. HCV diagnosis is defined as a positive RNA test result. HIV diagnosis is defined as an acute (i.e., antigen positive but antibody negative) or established (i.e., antibody positive) infection.

Time frame
Time Frame: 6 months pre- and post-implementation
2

Absolute number of new HCV or HIV diagnoses

Absolute number of positive results among performed tests. HCV diagnosis is defined as a positive RNA test result. HIV diagnosis is defined as an acute (i.e., antigen positive but antibody negative) or established (i.e., antibody positive) infection.

Time frame
6 months pre- and post-implementation

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of BPA alerts among individuals presenting to EDs

BPA alert for HepC-End or universal screening

Time frame
6 months pre- and post-implementation
2

Proportion of HCV and HIV tests performed among BPA alerts

Time frame
6 months pre- and post-implementation
3

Proportion of patients linked to care among those with positive HCV and HIV diagnoses

Linkage to care will be defined as a patient attending a first medical appointment within 3 months of receiving an HCV or HIV diagnosis.

Time frame
3 months after diagnosis
4

Composite HCV or HIV Diagnoses

All HCV and HIV diagnoses will be considered separately and will include both new and repeat diagnoses.

Time frame
6 months pre- and post-implementation

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Florida

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: