About this trial
Given that WLWH are more likely to develop persistent HPV infection and CC, effective screening and the management and treatment of pre-cancerous cervical abnormalities is critical to decrease the global burden of cervical cancer. The vast majority of WLWH live in SSA, where resources are more constrained. Therefore, simple, affordable, and effective tools are needed for the prevention of cervical cancer in SSA. In this setting, the best method for treatment of screen-positive WLWH has not been determined. The proposed study will compare the effectiveness of TA vs. LEEP, for treating precursor lesions (CIN 2/3) and HPV infection in WLWH, identify the determinants of treatment failure, and develop a strategy to predict patients in whom treatment is likely to fail so that alternative treatments can be provided. Moreover, local evidence of the optimal method of treatments is necessary to inform health policy and promote adherence.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
ages 25-49 years;
confirmed HIV infection;
physically and mentally willing and able to participate in the study, and provide informed consent.
Disqualifiers
currently pregnant or <6 weeks post-partum;
had a hysterectomy and no longer have a cervix;
a history of cervical cancer or treatment for cervical abnormalities; and
any medical, psychiatric, or other condition that would interfere with protocol adherence, assessment of safety, and/or ability/competence to provide informed consent.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Thermal ablation
DeviceThermal ablative uses heat (100°C to 120°C) to cause localized tissue damage at the cervical transformation zone and destroy the abnormal epithelium.
LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE
Procedure/SurgeryCervical tissue excision
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Comparison of treatment success rates for biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3: Thermoablation (TA) vs. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP)
The treatment success rate (12-month efficacy) of LEEP (pL) and that of ablation (pA) for participants with ablation-eligible CIN 2/3 will be measured by assessing the proportion of patients in each treatment group whose lesions completely regress or are successfully treated without recurrence over a defined follow-up period.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Mozambique
Lead sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborator