Augmenting Urinary Reflex Activity Study 4 (Including eXtended Indications)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age22+
SponsorAmber Therapeutics Ltd

About this trial

Exploratory safety and feasibility study of personalized adaptive pudendal neuromodulation for mixed urinary incontinence and extended indications using an implanted (Picostim™ II) system.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Female. NB: the definition of female refers to sex at birth.

Adult: aged ≥ 22 years (at the time of informed consent signature).

Patient self-reports both stress and urge episodes (clinician-opinion on history taking).

Patient has failed to respond to or could not tolerate conservative treatment as determined by the treating health care provider.

Disqualifiers

Patient is pregnant, breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant at any time in the future.

Patient is unwilling or unable to use contraception during sexual intercourse for the duration of the study.

In the event that patient becomes pregnant during or after the study, they are not prepared to inactivate device for the whole period of the pregnancy.

Any significant medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, is likely to interfere with study procedures, device operation, or likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pudendal neuromodulation

    Device

    In this feasibility study, all subjects will receive the Amber UI system.

Treatment groups

86 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Cohort AExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Cohort BExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Summative rates of procedural and device related adverse events and device deficiencies.

Time frame
12 months
2

Urinary Distress Inventory score change

Score minimum 0 to maximum 100. Lower score is better outcome.

Time frame
6 months
3

Proportion of participants requiring surgical reintervention.

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Urinary Distress Inventory (total, total Mixed Urinary Incontinence) score change

Score minimum 0 to maximum 100. Lower score is better outcome.

Time frame
12 months
2

3-day voiding diary number of events

Fewer events is better outcome.

Time frame
12 months
3

24-hour pad test weight change

Lower weight is better outcome.

Time frame
12 months
4

The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire score change

Score minimum 0 to maximum 21. Lower score is better outcome.

Time frame
12 months

Other outcomes

1

Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score change (Cohort B Chronic Pelvic Pain only)

Score minimum 0 to maximum 40. Lower score is better outcome.

Time frame
12 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.