Autonomic Dysfunction in Functional Dysphonia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorUniversity Ghent

About this trial

The first objective of this research project is to compare the occurrence and frequency of symptoms and/or disorders related to autonomic dysfunction in patients with functional dysphonia with gender- and age-matched vocally healthy controls, using a case-control study.

The second objective is to compare the effects of a novel therapy based on autonomic nervous system regulation (i.e., ANS therapy: heart rate variability biofeedback), for functional dysphonia versus coventional voice therapy (CVT) alone or in combination with ANS regulation therapy (i.e., ANS therapy + CVT), using a longitudinal randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ANS regulation therapy

    Behavioral

    innovative intervention for functional dysphonia

  • conventional voice therapy (CVT)

    Behavioral

    conventional voice therapy traditionally provided for functional dysphonia

  • ANS regulation therapy + CVT

    Behavioral

    combination of ANS regulation therapy and CVT

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Autonomic nervous system (ANS) regulation therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: conventional voice therapy (CVT)Active comparator 1 intervention
Group C: ANS regulation therapy + CVTActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

heart rate variability (HRV)

Heart rate variability (HRV, in ms) is an autonomic index measuring the variation of the interval between consecutive heartbeats and is vagally regulated (PSA) (Thayer et al., 2009; Pizzoli et al., 2021; Singh Solorzano et al., 2022). It measures direct Vagus nerve activation potential on a cardiac level (Thayer \& Lane, 2000; Sars, 2022). High HRV is associated with high vagal tone, whereas low HRV indicates ANS dysregulation with low vagal tone and SA prominence (Idrobo-Ávila et al., 2022). HRV will be determined at rest with electrocardiography using Kubios HRV analysis software (Tarvainen et al., 2002; 2014; Niskanen et al., 2004). Ag/AgCl surface electrodes will be positioned on the participant's chest in a modified lead II configuration.

Time frame
baseline (before the intervention), 1 months (after the intervention), 3 months follow-up
2

Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI)

The DSI is an objective multiparametric indices that quantifies voice quality (Wuyts et al., 2000)

Time frame
baseline (before the intervention), 1 months (after the intervention), 3 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

1

Pre-ejection period

The pre-ejection period is the time between the onset of depolarization of the left ventricle and the opening of the aortic valves and will be calculated as a cardiovascular index of SA (Lozano et al., 2007)

Time frame
baseline (before the intervention), 1 months (after the intervention), 3 months follow-up
2

Respiration rate

Respiration rate (in bpm) will be determined via thoracic impedance (De Geus et al., 1995). For each respiratory cycle, the total cycle time between the start of inspiration and the end of expiration will be extrapolated to a per-minute respiration rate

Time frame
baseline (before the intervention), 1 months (after the intervention), 3 months follow-up
3

Skin conductance level

Skin conductance level (in µS) will measure the tonic electrodermal activity and reflects increased SA (Dawson et al., 2017).

Time frame
baseline (before the intervention), 1 months (after the intervention), 3 months follow-up
4

The Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale

The Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS; Morton et al., 2022) is a psychometrically valid measure determining psychological, relational and physiological safety. It consists of 29 items subdivided into 3 subscales: compassion (e.g. I felt caring), social engagement (e.g. I felt accepted by others) and body sensations (e.g. My body felt relaxed).

Time frame
baseline (before the intervention), 1 months (after the intervention), 3 months follow-up

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University Ghent

Lead sponsor

Universiteit Antwerpen

Collaborator

University of Utah

Collaborator