About this trial
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of a new psychological therapy, Avatar Therapy, to the current standard therapy, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), in improving outcomes in people living with psychotic disorders who have persisting experiences of hearing voices (auditory verbal hallucinations, AVHs).
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Schizophrenia-related disorder or a mood disorder with psychotic symptoms diagnosis confirmed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID)
Experiencing current auditory verbal hallucinations as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) item P3 ≥ 4
Auditory verbal hallucinations present for at least one year
AVHs include significant negative content (PSYRATS item 6 ≥ 2) and/or AVHs are distressing (PSYRATS item item 9 ≥ 2)
Disqualifiers
Auditory verbal hallucinations attributable to a primary substance use disorder or organic disorder
Estimated full scale IQ < 70 (using the Test of Premorbid Functioning, TOPF)
Within the last month or planned at the time of intake: a change of antipsychotic medication,
Current or within the past 3 months receipt of individual psychological therapy for hearing voices, or receipt of electro-convulsive therapy or other brain stimulation treatment;
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Avatar therapy
BehavioralSeven 50-minute therapy sessions conducted by videoconferencing.
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)
BehavioralSeven 50-minute therapy sessions conducted by videoconferencing.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Auditory verbal hallucination severity, measured by total score on the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale - Auditory Hallucinations Scale (PSYRATS-AHS)
Clinician-rated scale providing an index of overall severity based on 11 aspects of hallucinations (frequency, duration, intensity of distress, etc.), rated masked to treatment allocation. Each of the 11-items are scored on a 5-point scale (0 - 4), scores range from 0 to 44, with increased symptom expression indicated by higher scores.
Secondary outcomes
Change in auditory verbal hallucination severity, measured by total score on the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale - Auditory Hallucinations Scale (PSYRATS-AHS) over follow-ups
Follow-up timepoints on the clinician rated scale that is used to measure the primary outcome. Includes 11-items that are scored on a 5-point scale (0 - 4), scores range from 0 to 44, with increased symptom expression indicated by higher scores.
Change in auditory verbal hallucination-related distress, measured by the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale - Auditory Hallucinations Scale (PSYRATS-AHS) Distress Score
Subscale of the clinician-rated scale that is used to measure the primary outcome. This includes 1-item that is scored on a 5-point scale (0 - 4), score ranges from 0 to 4, with increased symptom expression indicated by a higher score.
Remission of hallucinations, indexed by a score below 3 on the Hallucination scale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales (PANSS)
Clinician-rated scale to assess presence and severity of hallucinations. This includes 1-item, scored from 1 to 7, with increased symptom expression indicated by higher scores.
Change in overall psychosis symptom severity, measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales (PANSS) total and sub scale scores
Clinician-rated scale to assess overall psychotic symptom severity on total and sub scale scores (Positive, Negative and General Psychopathology). Includes a total of 30-items that are scored on a 7-point scale (1 - 7). Total score ranges from 30 to 210; Positive and Negative sub scale scores range from 7 to 49; General Psychopathology sub scale scores range from 16 to 112. Higher scores are indicative of increased symptom expression.
Other outcomes
Satisfaction with therapy, measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
The 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) will be administered at the end of treatment to assess and compare participants satisfaction across the two therapies. In addition, a group of participants will be purposively sampled to be invited to take part in a detailed semi-structured qualitative interview (conducted by a non-blinded researcher) about their experiences of the intervention.
Adverse effects of therapy
Negative psychological effects such as discomfort and anxiety that are relevant to tolerability will be measured using the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ), a 32-item psychometrically validated questionnaire developed for monitoring adverse effects of psychological therapies. The NEQ items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4) and differentiates between negative effects attributed to treatment and those caused by other circumstances. Potential deterioration in AVHs will be reported for each group by the proportion of participants showing deterioration above a reliable change index for the PSYRATS. Serious adverse events (SAEs) will include participant death, hospital admissions, episodes of crisis, assessment team treatment, attempted suicide, and violent incidents leading to police involvement; these will be recorded systematically.
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness calculations will use the Assessment of Quality of Life - 8 Dimensions (AQoL-8D) to measure quality of life as an index of utility, expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The AQoL-8D includes 35-items covering 8 dimensions: Independent Living, Pain, Senses, Mental Health, Happiness, Coping, Relationships, and Self-worth. To both measure treatment as usual (TAU) and determine broader treatment costs, a Resource Use Questionnaire (RUQ), adapted for use in this population, will be used. Consent for administrative data (e.g., Medicare and Pharmaceutical Benefits, MBS/PBS) will also be collected. Prescribed medication will be considered in terms of both cost and chlorpromazine -equivalent antipsychotic medication dose.
Change in the impact of AVHs, measured by the Voice Impact Scale (VIS)
Self-report measure of the degree of impact of hearing voices on domains of distress, interference with day-to-day functioning, and positive impacts. Includes 24-items. Each item is individually scored from 0 (disagree completely) to 10 (agree completely) with higher scores on individual items indicating higher agreement with the items listed experience. Not applicable is also available if the item is not relevant.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Swinburne University of Technology
Lead sponsor
University of Copenhagen
Collaborator
University of Manchester
Collaborator
University of Melbourne
Collaborator
Monash University
Collaborator
Perth Voices Clinic
Collaborator
University of the Sunshine Coast
Collaborator
University of Toronto
Collaborator