Balneotherapy in Hand Osteoarthritis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age50-75
SponsorAfyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

About this trial

There are a limited number of studies in the literature on the effectiveness of balneotherapy in hand osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of balneotherapy on pain, manual skills, functionality and quality of life in patients with hand osteoarthritis who have undergone balneotherapy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Between the ages of 50-75

Hand osteoarthritis diagnosed according to ACR criteria

Disqualifiers

Non-cooperative patients

Trauma or surgery to the hand region in the last 6 months

Infection

Infection, loss of sensation, metal implant in the treatment area

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Exercise

    Other intervention

    After their treatment, both groups will be given a daily exercise program (15 minutes of range of motion, 15 minutes of strengthening exercises) once a day, accompanied by a physiotherapist.

  • Paraffin

    Other intervention

    It was planned to apply paraffin treatment to both hands for 20 minutes, five times a week for 4 weeks, using one session per day for a total of 20 sessions.

  • Balneotherapy

    Other intervention

    The balneotherapy group will receive 20 minutes of paraffin and 20 minutes of balneotherapy on both hands, five times a week for 4 weeks, one session per day for a total of 20 sessions. The spa treatment will be given in the form of a 20-minute full body bath in the pool in each session. The spa water temperature will be 38-40 degrees Celsius.

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Balneotherapy GroupExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Control GroupActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Visual Pain Scale (VAS)

VAS which is easy to understand, apply and interpret, and provides valid and reliable data in a short time, is the most commonly used method in clinics. With a 100 mm visual linear scale, the patient is told that there is no pain at point 0, and that the most severe pain they have ever felt at point 100, and the patient is asked to put a mark on the point corresponding to their pain.

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)
2

Palm-to-finger distance

Palm-to-finger distance Used to assess hand joint mobility. Obtained by measuring the distance (in millimeters) between the fingertip of the second to fifth finger and the distal palmar crease while making a full fist and adding the distances (higher scores indicate greater limitations).

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)
3

The Australian / Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN)

It was developed specifically for use in hand osteoarthritis. It is recommended for use in clinical studies by OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials Group). It evaluates hand functions, pain and stiffness in patients with hand osteoarthritis. It consists of three subscales: Hand pain (5 items), hand stiffness (1 item), hand function (9 items). A 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 4=severe) LK 3.0 is used. Its validity and reliability have been demonstrated in osteoarthritis.

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)
4

Hand Osteoarthritis Functional Index

It is a 10-question questionnaire. Answers are scored on a 4-point scale: 0 = Possible without difficulty; 1 = Possible with some difficulty; 2 = Possible with great difficulty; 3 = Impossible. The total score for the questionnaire ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates a more severe functional limitation. Validity and reliability in Turkish have been demonstrated.

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)

Secondary outcomes

1

Nine Hole Pag Test

This test measures manual dexterity based on performance (seconds). A wooden board with nine holes on it, 9 short wooden sticks and a box in which the wooden sticks can be placed are placed in front of the patient. The patient is asked to place the wooden sticks in the box into the holes on the board as quickly as possible using the hand to be evaluated, then is asked to put the sticks back into the box one by one. The test completion time is determined by a stopwatch

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)
2

Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test

Test items are turning cards, picking up small objects and throwing them into a tin can, stacking backgammon tiles, writing, jumping 5 light tin cans across, jumping 5 heavy tin cans across, collecting 5 dried kidney beans using a dessert spoon The test materials include detailed instructions for use in the test manual. In order to ensure a standard arrangement of the objects used, a scaled board and a stopwatch are included in the test materials to measure the time the activities are performed. Before the test is administered, the person is shown how to do it. Explaining that the test is performed against time is necessary for the patient's motivation. The patient starts with the start command and the stopwatch is stopped when the activity is completed.

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)
3

Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)

HAQ was developed for the assessment of patients with rheumatic diseases. It consists of 20 questions related to eight activities (items); dressing, getting up, eating, walking, hygiene, grasping and activities of daily living are questioned. HAQ reflects the functional status of patients and this questionnaire has been shown to correlate with disease activity markers. Each item or question is rated on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 (normal/no difficulty), 1 (some difficulty), 2 (much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do). The 8 category scores are averaged, which represent an overall score from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). Scores 0-1 indicates mild to moderate disability, 1-2 indicates moderate to severe disability, and 2-3 indicates severe to very severe disability.

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)
4

SF-36 Quality of Life Scale

SF-36 is a generic quality of life scale. It is evaluated between 0-100 points. It was created to evaluate health status. It contains a total of 36 items. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.There is a Turkish validity and reliability study.

Time frame
Before treatment (T0), after treatment (4. week) (T1), 8. week (T2)

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: