About this trial
Native Hawaiians (NH) are 9.5 times more likely to be on dialysis or need a kidney transplant compared to Whites. They have the highest end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) incidence rates in the nation, begin dialysis at younger ages (30-50 years), and one of the most under-studied racial/ethnic groups in chronic kidney disease (CKD) research. This project's outcome is to improve kidney disease follow-up among early stage NHs at high risk by aligning health equity with a culturally appropriate care coordination systems model.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
greater or equal to 18 years
self-reported as Native Hawaiian
eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (Stage 3a-3b CKD) and/or greater or equal to 30 mg/g UACR
have participated in the NKFH KEDS Program within 3 months
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
culturally informed care coordination intervention
BehavioralCulturally Informed Care Coordination Strategies
No Intervention - Usual Care Group
Other interventionNo Intervention - Usual Care Group
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Acceptability to Intervention
Acceptability (the degree to which an intervention is perceived a good fit) Acceptability will be measured by a survey likert scale of 1 (not acceptable) - 10 (most acceptable) Name of measurement tool is reference in Procter et al (p. 69): Procter E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research, conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Mental Health. 2022: 38 (2): 65-76.
Adoption of the Intervention
Adoption (intent to implement) Adoption will be scored as 0 (not at all implemented), 5 (somewhat implemented), and 10 (fully implemented). Name of measurement tool is reference in Procter et al (p. 69): Procter E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research, conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Mental Health. 2022: 38 (2): 65-76.
Feasibility of the Intervention
Feasibility (possibility of successful implementation), Feasibility will be measured by a survey likert scale of 1 (not feasible) - 10 (most feasible). Name of measurement tool is reference in Procter et al (p. 69): Procter E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research, conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Mental Health. 2022: 38 (2): 65-76.
Secondary outcomes
Beliefs to Change of the Intervention
TOTAL SCORE of 4 Questions will measure the secondary outcome measure - Beliefs to Change. Believe that rescreening for eGFR \& UACR can directly influence your health Believe that integrating eGFR and UACR are worthwhile use of health care services Believe that primary care providers are committed to supporting rescreening for eGFR \& UACR Believe that rescreening for eGFR and UACR belong in primary care health services. Asked to complete a survey with a 10-point Likert scale (0=Strongly Disagree to 10=Strongly Agree). Scores will be added to obtain a Total Score to measure the secondary outcome measure - Beliefs to Change.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University of Hawaii
Lead sponsor
National Kidney Foundation, United States
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: