About this trial
Patients frequently present to the emergency department for treatment of acute pain. In the emergency department, analgesic medications, particularly opiates, are most often the primary and only means of treatment. Alternative therapies such as traditional acupuncture have been studied and utilized in acute care settings; however, the need for extensive training, the use of needles, and state-specific acupuncture licensing requirements have been barriers to widespread use. Battlefield Auricular Acupressure (BAA) is a needle-free five-point technique on the outer ear that has been developed and employed by the military for a variety of painful conditions.
The primary objective of this study is to determine if battlefield auricular acupressure (BAA), compared to a sham procedure, results in a reduction in pain score at 30 minutes and 60 minutes post-intervention, by at least 2 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) points below their baseline pain score, compared to participants receiving a sham procedure, for adults who present to the emergency department with a chief complaint of back pain and/or low back.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult patient (Age ≥ 18) presenting to the ED
Chief complaint of back pain and/or low back pain
Pain score ≥ 4 on 0-10 NRS
Disqualifiers
Pregnancy
Known allergy to adhesive
Presence of cochlear implants
Piercings at one or more of the BAA or sham sites
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Battlefield auricular acupressure
Procedure/SurgeryBattlefield auricular acupressure: Ear seeds will be applied to the five established BAA points: Cingulate Gyrus, Thalamus, Omega 2, Point Zero, and Shen Men.
Sham
Procedure/SurgeryEar seeds will be applied to five pre-defined, non-therapeutic points on the ear helix and lobe, chosen for their lack of known effect on pain. The procedure will be identical in duration and interaction to the BAA group.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Pain Score
Pain scores will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable")10. This study will compare the mean pain scores between the BAA group and the sham group.
Secondary outcomes
Change in Pain Score at 24 Hours
To assess the lasting effect of the intervention, a delayed follow-up 24-hour assessment will be conducted. Pain scores will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable")10. Delayed follow-up pain score will be calculated as (NRS at 24 hours) - (NRS at baseline).
Incidence of Any Analgesic Medication Use
The proportion of patients in each group (intervention vs. sham) who require any analgesic medication following the intervention. This will be analyzed as a dichotomous (yes/no) outcome.
Incidence of Opioid Medication Use
The proportion of patients in each group (intervention vs. sham) who are administered an opioid analgesic following the intervention. This is a specific subset of analgesia and will be analyzed as a dichotomous (yes/no) outcome.
Incidence of Non-Opioid Analgesic Medication Use
The proportion of patients in each group who require at least one dose of a non-opioid analgesic.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Hackensack Meridian Health
Lead sponsor
New Jersey Health Foundation
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: