Belumosudil Versus Ruxolitinib for Steroid-Refractory or Breakthrough Hepatic cGVHD

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age12+
SponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

About this trial

This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial aims to compare second-line treatment strategies for hepatic cGVHD after allo-HSCT. Ruxolitinib and belumosudil are both effective for cGVHD, but no head-to-head comparison specifically in hepatic cGVHD has been reported. Two cohorts are enrolled: Cohort 1 comprises patients with steroid-refractory hepatic cGVHD without prior ruxolitinib or belumosudil exposure, randomized to receive either agent. Cohort 2 includes patients who develop new-onset hepatic cGVHD after ≥4 weeks of therapy with ruxolitinib or belumosudil for other-organ cGVHD (stable for ≥2 weeks), or patients with non-response/progression on either agent for hepatic cGVHD; these patients will be switched to the opposite drug. Key questions include: • In steroid-refractory hepatic cGVHD, does 24-week hepatic overall response rate differ between belumosudil and ruxolitinib? • What is the hepatic response rate after drug switching in Cohort 2? • How do the two agents compare in safety and tolerability for hepatic cGVHD? • What are their impacts on corticosteroid tapering, failure-free survival, and long-term outcomes? Participants will: • Receive assigned treatment per cohort and randomization • Undergo regular efficacy/safety monitoring, including hepatic cGVHD scoring, liver function tests, and adverse event recording • Provide peripheral blood samples at baseline and multiple on-treatment time points for exploratory biomarker analysis • Complete 24-week primary efficacy assessment with follow-up until progression or discontinuation Primary endpoint is 24-week hepatic overall response rate (CR+PR, per 2014 NIH cGVHD criteria). Secondary endpoints include duration of response, failure-free survival, corticosteroid tapering rate, safety (AE/SAE incidence), liver function improvement, and patient-reported outcomes. This head-to-head comparison will provide high-level evidence for selecting second-line and beyond therapies for hepatic cGVHD.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 12 years at time of signing informed consent.

Received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Meets 2014 NIH consensus criteria for hepatic cGVHD (≥1 of: total bilirubin > 2×ULN, ALP > 2×ULN, ALT > 2×ULN, or liver biopsy-proven cGVHD-related injury), after excluding other causes.

ECOG performance status ≤ 2.

Disqualifiers

Receiving newly initiated systemic cGVHD therapy other than corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs); corticosteroids and CNIs must be on a stable regimen for ≥2 weeks prior to screening.

Uncontrolled active acute GVHD (≥ grade 2).

Active viral hepatitis or HIV infection.

Liver function abnormalities due to other causes, including but not limited to drug-induced liver injury, autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, biliary obstruction, VOD/SOS, iron overload, Gilbert's syndrome, or hemolysis.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ruxolitinib treatment

    Drug

    Ruxolitinib treatment

  • Belumosudil treatment

    Drug

    Belumosudil treatment

  • Belumosudil Switch to Ruxolitinib

    Drug

    Belumosudil Switch to Ruxolitinib

  • Ruxolitinib Switch to Belumosudil

    Drug

    Ruxolitinib Switch to Belumosudil

Treatment groups

170 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Ruxolitinib GroupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Belumosudil GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Belumosudil Switch to Ruxolitinib GroupOther 1 intervention
Group D: Ruxolitinib Switch to Belumosudil GroupOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Hepatic cGVHD at Week 24

Time frame
at Week 24 after treatment

Secondary outcomes

1

Best overall response (BOR)

Time frame
Assessed continuously throughout the study from the date of randomization,up to 24 weeks after treatment
2

Duration of response (DOR)

Time frame
From first response to progression/death, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years after the date of randomization
3

Incidence of adverse events (AEs)

Time frame
Continuous monitoring from first dose to 30 days after last dose
4

Quality of life (QoL) score

Time frame
Assessed at baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and end of treatment

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Lead sponsor

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

Collaborator

Ruijin Hospital

Collaborator

Tongji Hospital

Collaborator

Peking University People's Hospital

Collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University

Collaborator