About this trial
This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with the BioBrace® Implant vs. arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone in subjects requiring surgical intervention for a full-thickness rotator cuff tear.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Male or female 40 to 70 years old
Tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons
Tear size ≥ 2 cm and < 5 cm
Chronic shoulder pain ≥ 3 months
Disqualifiers
Previous surgery of the index shoulder one year prior to the study surgery excluding diagnostic arthroscopy
Fatty infiltration of the index shoulder rotator cuff muscle ≥ Grade 3 (Goutallier Score)
Major medical condition that could affect quality of life and influence the results of the study as determined by the Investigator
Oral steroid use or steroid injection within 6 weeks prior to surgery
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with BioBrace® Implant augmentation.
DeviceAn arthroscopic rotator cuff repair will be performed and augmented with the BioBrace® Implant. The BioBrace® Implant is intended for use in surgical procedures for reinforcement of soft tissue where weakness exists. It is a bioresorbable, biocomposite scaffold composed of a highly porous collagen sponge and reinforced with poly-L-lactic-acid (PLLA). When used in rotator cuff repairs, it is placed on top of the tendons to augment and reinforce the underlying repair. The BioBrace® is designed to mechanically and biologically augment weakened or torn soft tissue and can be integrated into surgeons' standard of care rotator cuff repair techniques.
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Procedure/SurgeryAn arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed using standard surgical procedure.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
6 Month Retear Rate
The between-group difference in radiological incidence (MRI) of a Sugaya Type IV or V full-thickness discontinuity at postoperative Month 6.
Secondary outcomes
12 Month Retear Rate
The between-group difference in radiological incidence (MRI) of Sugaya Type IV or V full-thickness discontinuity at postoperative Month 12.
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Adjusted mean between-group difference in SANE score from baseline to 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-op
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)
Adjusted mean between-group difference in WORC score from baseline to 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-op
EuroQOL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Adjusted mean between-group difference in health-related, quality of life from baseline to 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-op
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.