Biomechanical Validation of the Caregiver Assisted Transfer Technique Instrument

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorVA Office of Research and Development

About this trial

As of 2020, 53 million Americans provide unpaid care to an individual with a disability. One commonly performed activity of daily living (ADL) provided by informal caregivers is assisted transfers, which requires moving an individual from one surface to another. Approximately 94% of informal caregivers who assist with ADLs to persons with adult-onset chronic physical disabilities affecting mobility reported musculoskeletal discomfort, with pain and discomfort made worse by performing caregiving activities. Although many informal caregivers assist with transfers, most have never received any formal training in proper manual lifting or mechanical lifting techniques. Improper transfer techniques can be detrimental to not only caregiver health but also to the persons they assist resulting in shoulder injury, bruising and pain from manual lift techniques, hip fractures from falls, and skin tears from shear force that occurs with sliding during transfers. Current standard of care provides limited in-person training of caregivers, as most of the rehabilitation process is client-focused. When training is provided clinicians have no means to objectively evaluate if proper techniques are being performed at discharge or when the caregiver and care recipient return home. For this reason, an outcome measure called the Caregiver Assisted Transfer Technique Instrument (CATT) was developed to provide a quick, objective way to evaluate proper technique of caregivers who provide transfer assistance to individuals with disabilities. The CATT evaluates the caregiver's performance on setup, quality of the task performance, and results. After a formal assessment through stakeholder review involving clinicians, informal caregivers, and individuals with physical disabilities who require transfer assistance, the CATT was expanded to include two versions; one that evaluates manual lift technique (CATT-M) and one that evaluates mechanical lift techniques (CATT-L). However, the CATT must undergo further testing with informal caregivers and the individuals they assist to determine if the CATT is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for identifying skill deficits in caregivers performing assisted transfers. The purpose of this study is to establish the psychometric properties (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) of the CATT and to evaluate the effects of an individualized training session for participants who have transfer technique deficits as identified by the CATT. The long-term goal of this research is to develop the CATT so that it can be used as an objective indicator of transfer performance as well as guide training and educational interventions for informal caregivers to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal pain and injury associated with assisted transfers.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

routinely provide transfer assistance to an adult with a physical disability

serving as a caregiver for at least 3 months

no formal didactic or structured training on assisted transfer techniques received as part of a professional degree or training program

has a physical disability diagnosis for at least one year

Disqualifiers

have existing pressure ulcers or a recent history of pressure ulcers within the last 3 months

have any recent upper extremity injuries (within the last 6 months) that could be exacerbated by being transferred

Trial population

Caregivers and care recipients who are eligible for the study will be recruited through community locations, including rehabilitation facilities, organizations that provide services to both caregivers and individuals with physical disabilities, research registries for individuals with disabilities, and at at national and local rehabilitation events, disability conferences and expos.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Transfer Training with clinician

    Other intervention

    Participants will undergo transfer training with a clinician who is an expert on assisted transfer techniques if they are found to have skill deficits during the study. After training, a transfer assessment will be conducted to examine if the transfer skills of the caregiver have improved

Treatment groups

160 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Informal Caregivers1 intervention
Group B: Individuals who use transfer assistance1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Caregiver Assisted Transfer Technique Instrument (CATT) Scores

An outcome measure called the Caregiver Assisted Transfer Technique Instrument (CATT) was developed to provide a quick, objective way to evaluate proper technique of caregivers who provide transfer assistance to individuals with disabilities. The CATT consists of two versions; one that evaluates manual lift technique (CATT-M) and one that evaluates mechanical lift techniques (CATT-L). It uses three subdomains (set up, transfer performance, and results) to assess caregiver technique during transfers. The investigators expect to see improvements in CATT Scores (higher scores) after intervention with a therapist.

Time frame
Change from baseline and after intervention at 1 week

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in peak lumbar extension moments

High lumbar extension moments have been associated with poor lifting technique. Using proper lifting technique has been shown to reduce moments at the L5/S1 joint. The investigators expect to see lower lumbar extension moments after a transfer training intervention with a therapist. Lumbar extension moments will be determined using an inverse dynamics model with data from IMUs and pressure insoles as inputs to the model.

Time frame
Change from baseline and after intervention at 1 week
2

Change in peak lumbar compression forces

High Lumbar compression forces at L5/S1 have been associated with low back pain in caregivers who perform lifting tasks. Using proper lifting techniques have been shown to reduce compressive forces at the L5/S1 joint. The investigators expect to see lower lumbar compressive forces after transfer training with a therapist. Lumbar compressive forces will be determined using an inverse dynamics model, with raw data from IMUs and pressure insoles at the model inputs.

Time frame
Change from baseline and after intervention at 1 week

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.