Can Lower-body Occlusion Influence Sports Recovery?
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age17-23
SponsorUniversity of Maia
About this trial
This study ai ms to compare the recovery kinetics of different interventions: i) active recovery; ii) continuous vascular occlusion during active recovery; iii) intermittent vascular occlusion during active recovery; iv) control group.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
soccer players
elite athletes
present in the pitch training sessions
Disqualifiers
injured athletes
female athletes
Trial design
Design model
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Exercise
Other interventionRecovery with vascular occlusion or active recovery in soccer players.
Treatment groups
15 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groupsGroup A: ARExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: AR+ continuous BFRExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: AR + intermittent BFRExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: Control groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
countermovement jump height
countermovement jump height measured using chronojump.
Time frame
Baseline, post 30 minutes, post 24 hours2
squat jump height
Squat jump height measured using chronojump
Time frame
Baseline, post 30 minutes, post 24 hours3
Bar velocity during squat
Squat velocity measured using a linear encoder
Time frame
Baseline, post 30 minutes, post 24 hours4
hip thrust bar velocity
hip thrust bar velocity measured using a linear encoder
Time frame
Baseline, post 30 minutes, post 24 hoursLocations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: