Carbon Fiber Transpedicular Screws in Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Disease

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCopernicus Memorial Hospital

About this trial

Background: Spinal metastatic disease constitute a serious clinical problem in oncology. Bones are the third most common organ where metastases are located, and the spine is the place where they are most often located. Due to the complexity of the clinical problem, metastatic spine disease remains of interest to many medical specialties: neurosurgery, orthopedics, clinical oncology, radiotherapy and rehabilitation. With the development of modern diagnostic methods and wider access to them, the demand for neurosurgical treatment in this group of patients is growing. Surgical treatment is undertaken in cases of spinal cord compression, instability, spinal deformation or pain that is resistant to radiotherapy. The standard treatment in most cases is posterior instrumentation of the spine using titanium pedicle screws. Unfortunately, these systems cause numerous artifacts in diagnostic imaging, both in CT and MRI. These distortions make it difficult to plan radiotherapy and determine the optimal dose that would avoid healthy tissues. Moreover, artifacts could make difficult postoperative follow-ups aimed at assessing local recurrence. The solution to these problems is the use of radiolucent implants. There are systems based on carbon fibers embedded in PEEK which do not cause typical artifacts for titanium implants.

Study plan: The open, three-arm, prospective randomized study is planned to involve 226 patients with metastatic disease of the spine, with a known or undiagnosed primary site. Patients will be qualified for 2 types of interventions. The first one includes treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) in the first stage of treatment and early instrumentation of the spine with titanium implants. The second type of intervention includes patients qualified for surgical treatment using spine stabilization and postoperative SBRT. Patients within this arm will be randomized into two groups differing in the type of material the instrumentation is made of: carbon-PEEK or titanium. The study group will be patients stabilized with carbon implants, and the control group will be those who will have titanium implants.

Study population: The study includes adult patients with metastatic spine disease, with a known or unknown primary tumor, qualified for SBRT and surgical treatment.

Assumed effects: It is assumed that the treatment proposed in the project would extend progression free survival by several months or achieve local control in an additional 5% of patients. Moreover, by improving the quality of imaging, earlier diagnosis of local recurrences and implementation of appropriate locoregional treatment would be possible.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Metastatic spinal disease,

ECOG quality of life of 0-2,

Eligibility for SBRT treatment,

Expected survival time >3 months,

Disqualifiers

Primary tumor of the spine,

Age <18 years old,

Expected survival time <3 months,

Eligibility for palliative radiotherapy,

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Transpedicular spinal stabilization - carbon fibers-based implants

    Procedure/Surgery

    Transpedicular stabilization with carbon fiber and PEEK-based implants in one of the two possible variants - first involves a large skin incision and separation of the back extensor muscles; second is associated with minimally invasive, which is percutaneous procedure that allows the stabilization with implants without the need to detach the muscles, using only a small skin incision.

  • Transpedicular spinal stabilization - titanium implants

    Procedure/Surgery

    Transpedicular stabilization with titanium implants in one of the two possible variants - first involves a large skin incision and separation of the back extensor muscles; second is associated with minimally invasive, which is percutaneous procedure that allows the stabilization with implants without the need to detach the muscles, using only a small skin incision.

  • Stereotactic body radiotherapy

    Radiation

    Spinal tumors will be treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy at a dose of 5x5 Gy (25 Gy in a total dose); either prior to or post-surgical treatment, accordingly the allocation to one of the study arms.

Treatment groups

226 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Transpedicular spinal stabilization using carbon system + SBRTExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Transpedicular spinal stabilization using titanium system + SBRTActive comparator 2 interventions
Group C: SBRT + Transpedicular spinal stabilization using titanium systemSham comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The assessment of time to local recurrence after treatment with SBRT.

Time frame
5 years
2

The assessment of frequency of local recurrence after treatment with SBRT.

Time frame
5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

DICE convergence factor evaluation between groups of patients.

The use of convergence factor assessment will allow for comparison of similarity in planned SBRT between all groups. This will allow an indirect assessment of difficulties in planning treatment by a radiotherapist using objective tools.

Time frame
1 day
2

The subjective difficulty of planning radiotherapy treatment.

Using a numerical scale from 0-10, the radiotherapist will assess the difficulty of planning, tumor coverage, and delineation of the spinal cord depending on the group assessed in the study.

Time frame
1 day
3

The frequency of radiation complications assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC).

Titanium instrumentation generates significant artifacts in radiological imaging used for radiotherapy planning. The use of opaque, radiolucent material allows for radiotherapy planning to cover a smaller area. This may reduce the incidence of radiation-related complications in nearby organs (OAR - organ at risk). These complications will be assessed by the radiation therapist according to the standardized NCI CTC scale. Potentially smaller quantity of organ complications could be an advantage supporting the use of carbon implants.

Time frame
5 years
4

Failure rate of stabilizing systems.

Titanium and carbon fiber show similar biocompatibility. The biomechanical properties of these materials are also similar. In vitro studies have shown a similar effect failure rate of carbon pedicle screws compared to standard titanium ones. However, carbon rods have greater flexibility and structure connected using these may show more frequent loosening in vivo, especially in cases with impaired sagittal balance. This was not an issue analyzed in the literature. The frequency of instrument failure is of great importance for clinical practice because most such cases require operative revision.

Time frame
5 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Copernicus Memorial Hospital

Lead sponsor

Medical Research Agency, Poland

Collaborator