Carbon Suspension vs. Metallic Marker for Axillary Lymph Node Marking in Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy

ConditionBreast Cancer
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorSaint Petersburg State University, Russia

About this trial

This single-center, randomized study aims to compare the intraoperative detection rates of axillary lymph nodes marked with carbon suspension versus metallic markers in breast cancer patients (T1-3N1M0) before neoadjuvant therapy. Primary endpoint: frequency of marked lymph node identification during surgery. Secondary endpoints: time from marking to surgery and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-BR23).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Women ≥18 years.

Morphologically confirmed breast cancer (T1-3N1M0).

ECOG 0-1.

Indication for neoadjuvant therapy.

Disqualifiers

No lymph node regression post-neoadjuvant therapy (persistent N1).

Distant metastasis progression.

Severe comorbidities (NYHA III-IV, COPD GOLD D, Child-Pugh C).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ultrasound-guided carbon suspension (Black Eye) injection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Under ultrasound guidance, 0.5 mL of sterile carbon particle suspension (Black Eye) is injected into the capsule of the metastatic axillary lymph node(s). Technique: Performed using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe (e.g., 12 MHz) and a 22G needle. Target: Up to 3 pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes. Timing: Performed before initiation of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Rationale: Carbon suspension provides long-term visual localization due to its black staining properties. Inert and biocompatible, with minimal risk of allergic reactions. Patients proceed to standard NST based on tumor subtype (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or endocrine therapy). Post-NST imaging (ultrasound, CT, or PET-CT) to assess treatment response. Surgical Intervention: Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) with removal of marked nodes + sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using fluorescent dye. Intraoperative frozen section analysis (hematoxylin \& eosin staining) of excised nodes.

  • Ultrasound-guided metallic marker (TWIRL ULTRACOR) placement

    Procedure/Surgery

    A 4-mm nitinol (nickel-titanium alloy) marker (TWIRL ULTRACOR) is deployed into the metastatic lymph node(s) under ultrasound guidance. Technique: Uses a specialized introducer kit for precise placement. Target: Up to 3 pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes. Timing: Performed before initiation of NST. Rationale: Nitinol markers are radiopaque, MRI-compatible, and resistant to migration. Standard method for tumor localization in breast cancer. Post-Marking Protocol: Identical NST and imaging follow-up as Group 1. Surgical Intervention: TAD with marker localization (palpation/imaging-guided excision) + SLNB. Intraoperative frozen section analysis.

Treatment groups

110 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Carbon Suspension (Black Eye) MarkingExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Metallic Marker (TWIRL ULTRACOR) PlacementActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Intraoperative detection rate of marked lymph nodes (%)

The proportion of successfully identified and excised marked lymph nodes during surgery, confirmed by visual (carbon suspension) or imaging/metallic detection (metallic marker)

Time frame
Assessed intraoperatively (day of surgery).

Secondary outcomes

1

Time from Marking to Surgery (Days)

Measures the duration (in days) between the lymph node marking procedure (carbon suspension or metallic seed placement) and the subsequent surgical intervention (targeted axillary dissection). This assesses the clinical feasibility and logistical timeline between marking and definitive treatment

Time frame
From the date of marking procedure (Day 0) to the date of surgery (up to 12 weeks post-marking)
2

Quality of Life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module [EORTC QLQ-BR23] Scores

Patient-reported outcomes assessed using the validated 23-item EORTC QLQ-BR23 questionnaire, which measures: Functional scales (Body Image, Sexual Functioning, Sexual Enjoyment, Future Perspective; higher scores = better outcomes), Symptom scales (Systemic Therapy Side Effects, Breast Symptoms, Arm Symptoms, Upset by Hair Loss; higher scores = worse outcomes). All items are scored 1-4 (raw scores) and transformed to a 0-100 scale. For functional scales, 100 represents optimal functioning; for symptom scales, 100 represents maximal symptom burden.

Time frame
1. Baseline (pre-marking), 2. Post-neoadjuvant therapy (pre-surgery) 3. 1-month postoperatively.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.