Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorFederal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health

About this trial

This is a multicenter prospective randomized blind controlled trial with a sham procedure group of the efficacy and safety of cardioneuroablation as a method of treating symptomatic bradycardia without a permanent pacemaker implantation

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Sinus rhythm at the time of switching on

Disqualifiers

Anamnesis of injury during syncopation due to bradycardia, except in the case when the patient refused to implant an electrocardiostimulator for his own reasons in writing;

Constant intake of antiarrhythmic drugs (for PVC, AF, etc.);

The presence of an implanted pacemaker, a heart contractility modulation device, a cardioverter defibrillator;

Drug-induced sinus bradycardia and/or atrioventricular block;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ganglionated plexi ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Through access in the femoral vein, a mapping or ablation-mapping catheter is inserted into the right atrium, and a three-dimensional reconstruction of the right atrium is performed using an electroanatomic mapping system. The inferior and superior vena cava, the coronary sinus are indicated. Then a transeptal puncture is performed using a transeptal introducer and a needle for transeptal puncture under fluoroscopic control. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the left atrium is performed using an electroanatomic mapping system. During or immediately after the creation of three-dimensional maps of both atria, areas of the typical concentration of ganglion plexuses (GP) are ablated using radiofrequency applications (30-50 Watts, 10-40 s each point). Ablated points are annotated on the three-dimensional map. GPs ablation zones are about 0.5 x 1.0 cm in size.

  • Electrophysiological study

    Diagnostic test

    Through access in the femoral vein, a diagnostic catheter is inserted in the area of the coronary sinus under fluoroscopic control. The effective refractory period (ERP) of the atria will be measured according to the method adopted in clinical practice, namely: using a ten-pole diagnostic electrode installed in the coronary sinus, a series of eight electrical pulses with the same amplitude and frequency is applied to the atrial myocardium. Then the ninth pulse is applied with a gradual decrease in the time interval until the absence of an atrial myocardium response to the pulse is registered. The cycle of an additional, ninth pulse, in which the atrial myocardium did not respond to an electrical impulse, is considered an atrial ERP.

Treatment groups

106 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: CardioneuroablationActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Sham groupSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Implantation of a permanent cardiac pacemaker

Once there is a recurrence of documented symptomatic bradycardia, a permanent pacemaker implantation is considered

Time frame
12 months post procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Complications of cardioneuroablation

Cardiac tamponade, pericardial effusion \>10 mm, esophageal damage, stroke or transient ischemic event, severe groin hematoma (hemoglobin level drop \>20%), atriovenous fistula in the groin

Time frame
30 days post procedure
2

Presence of symptomatic or asymptomatic rhythm pauses >6 seconds

As detected by ECG monitoring

Time frame
12 months post procedure
3

The presence of symptomatic or asymptomatic sinus bradycardia with an average heart rate <40 beats/min in the daytime

As detected by ECG monitoring

Time frame
12 months post procedure
4

Transient or permanent atrioventricular block

As detected by ECG monitoring

Time frame
12 months post procedure

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health

Lead sponsor

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Collaborator

The Federal Centre of Cardiovascular Surgery, Russia

Collaborator

Clinical City Hospital named after I.V. Davydovsky of Moscow Department of Healthcare

Collaborator

City Clinical Hospital No.52 of Moscow Healthcare Department

Collaborator

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Collaborator

Medical Centre Hospital of the President's Affairs Administration, Republic of Kazakhstan

Collaborator

Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Collaborator

Vishnevsky Center of Surgery

Collaborator

National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Collaborator