Care Coordination Educational Intervention Study for Patients From Rural Areas With Early Stage Cancer

ConditionCancer
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Vermont Medical Center

About this trial

Care Coordination is an essential component of cancer care delivery. Many patients experience poor care coordination. In this study, we hypothesize that provision of a video educational intervention to teach patients about cancer, care coordination and self-advocacy will improve patients' perception of care coordination. Cancer patients with early stage disease scheduled to receive adjuvant therapy, and who reside in a rural area, will be enrolled onto the study. Patients will be randomized to receive a table-based educational intervention tool initially (arm1) or after 4 months of therapy (arm2). Assessment of cancer knowledge, self-advocacy and care coordination will be obtained at baseline and after 4-6 months.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18+ years of age

Breast, lung, or colon cancer diagnosis

Stage I, II or III cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy started < 30 days or planned within the next 30 days

Disqualifiers

History of prior malignancy treated with chemotherapy in last 3 years

Known or suspected neuro-cognitive impairment

Resident of Chittenden County, Vermont

Patients with current diagnosis other than stage I, II or III breast, colon or lung cancer

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Table-based Educational Intervention

    Other intervention

    Tablet based educational tool with videos about care coordination, cancer knowledge and self-advocacy.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Upfront Educational InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Delayed Educational InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Care Coordination Instrument Score

Participants complete the Care Coordination Instrument (CCI), a 29-item questionnaire. Each item is rated on a Likert scale (Strongly Agree = 3 to Strongly Disagree = 0). A total score is generated by summing the item scores; possible total scores range from 0-87. Higher scores represent a greater perception of care coordination.

Time frame
Baseline and 4 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Cancer Knowledge

Participants complete the Cancer Knowledge Assessment Test (C-KAT). The test includes 5 multiple choice items. A total score is generated by summing the number of correct responses; total scores range from 0-5. Higher scores represent greater cancer knowledge.

Time frame
Baseline and 4 months
2

Satisfaction with Educational Videos

Participants in the baseline intervention group complete the Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire. This 5-item questionnaire assesses how helpful and easily accessible the educational videos were. There is also an open-ended question for other feedback. Answering yes to the items indicates greater satisfaction and ease of use.

Time frame
4 months
3

Self-Advocacy Score

Participants complete the Cancer Self-Advocacy Scale, a 20-item questionnaire. Each item is rated on a Likert scale (Strongly Agree = 6 to Strongly Disagree = 1). A total score is generated by summing the item scores; possible total scores range from 20-120. Higher scores represent greater self-advocacy skills.

Time frame
Baseline and 4 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.