About this trial
Care Coordination is an essential component of cancer care delivery. Many patients experience poor care coordination. In this study, we hypothesize that provision of a video educational intervention to teach patients about cancer, care coordination and self-advocacy will improve patients' perception of care coordination. Cancer patients with early stage disease scheduled to receive adjuvant therapy, and who reside in a rural area, will be enrolled onto the study. Patients will be randomized to receive a table-based educational intervention tool initially (arm1) or after 4 months of therapy (arm2). Assessment of cancer knowledge, self-advocacy and care coordination will be obtained at baseline and after 4-6 months.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
18+ years of age
Breast, lung, or colon cancer diagnosis
Stage I, II or III cancer
Adjuvant chemotherapy started < 30 days or planned within the next 30 days
Disqualifiers
History of prior malignancy treated with chemotherapy in last 3 years
Known or suspected neuro-cognitive impairment
Resident of Chittenden County, Vermont
Patients with current diagnosis other than stage I, II or III breast, colon or lung cancer
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Table-based Educational Intervention
Other interventionTablet based educational tool with videos about care coordination, cancer knowledge and self-advocacy.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Care Coordination Instrument Score
Participants complete the Care Coordination Instrument (CCI), a 29-item questionnaire. Each item is rated on a Likert scale (Strongly Agree = 3 to Strongly Disagree = 0). A total score is generated by summing the item scores; possible total scores range from 0-87. Higher scores represent a greater perception of care coordination.
Secondary outcomes
Cancer Knowledge
Participants complete the Cancer Knowledge Assessment Test (C-KAT). The test includes 5 multiple choice items. A total score is generated by summing the number of correct responses; total scores range from 0-5. Higher scores represent greater cancer knowledge.
Satisfaction with Educational Videos
Participants in the baseline intervention group complete the Satisfaction and Acceptability Questionnaire. This 5-item questionnaire assesses how helpful and easily accessible the educational videos were. There is also an open-ended question for other feedback. Answering yes to the items indicates greater satisfaction and ease of use.
Self-Advocacy Score
Participants complete the Cancer Self-Advocacy Scale, a 20-item questionnaire. Each item is rated on a Likert scale (Strongly Agree = 6 to Strongly Disagree = 1). A total score is generated by summing the item scores; possible total scores range from 20-120. Higher scores represent greater self-advocacy skills.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.