Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Dysphagia After Supratentorial Stroke

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age30-75
SponsorZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital

About this trial

It is estimated that 400,000 to 800,000 people worldwide develop neurogenic dysphagia annually. Stroke represents the most common etiology, with approximately 65% of acute stroke patients experiencing pharyngeal swallowing difficulties. Clinical manifestations of dysphagia vary widely in severity and may include residue, reflux, delayed swallowing initiation, aspiration, and cricopharyngeal muscle dysfunction. Due to its detrimental effects on nutrition, respiration, and psychosocial well-being, dysphagia significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Furthermore, the inability to swallow safely and efficiently can lead to serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, and depression. The traditional swallowing rehabilitation treatment has limited effect in clinical practice, which makes it necessary to search for new effective swallowing methods.

Conventional swallowing rehabilitation often yields limited clinical benefits, highlighting the urgent need for more effective therapeutic strategies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and safe neuromodulation technique that has shown promise in the field of neurorehabilitation. Its mechanisms extend beyond immediate cortical modulation and cerebral blood flow changes to include the regulation of synaptic plasticity, neurotransmitters such as glutamate and GABA, and excitability in remote subcortical regions. In recent years, tDCS has been increasingly applied to various neurological disorders, including post-stroke motor impairment, dysphagia, aphasia, depression, addiction, and spinal cord injury-related movement disorders. Currently, tDCS is being explored to elucidate its regulatory effects on cerebellar swallowing control, positioning it as a potential innovative treatment for neurogenic dysphagia.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with supratentorial stroke, confirmed by cranial MRI or CT as having cerebral infarction or hemorrhage;

Stable vital signs after conventional treatment, with disease duration between 1 and 6 months;

30 ≤ age ≤75 years, male or female;

Presence of dysphagia, drinking-induced coughing, and a Kubota Water Drinking Test grade of 3-5;

Disqualifiers

MRI-confirmed lesion involving the cerebellum;

Unstable vital signs;

Significant cognitive impairment (MMSE score ≤ 24);

Presence of swallowing apraxia;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Device

    Different experimental groups received tDCS stimulation at the following distinct sites: bilateral cerebellar hemispheres, bilateral cortical areas corresponding to the suprahyoid muscles, and combined bilateral cerebellar hemispheres alongside bilateral cortical areas corresponding to the suprahyoid muscles. Stimulation parameters: 2 mA constant current, 20 minutes per session Treatment regimen: 5 sessions per week for 2 consecutive weeks

  • Sham tDCS

    Other intervention

    The patients in this group will receive sham stimulation applied to the same area for the same duration.

Treatment groups

76 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Cerebellar tDCS GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Cortical (Suprahyoid Muscle) tDCS GroupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Combined Cerebellar and Cortical (Suprahyoid Muscle) tDCS GroupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group D: Sham tDCS GroupSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA)

Process: A clinician-administered scale performed in three sequential parts. Part 1 examines basic clinical signs (e.g., consciousness, lip closure, voluntary cough). Part 2 involves observing the patient swallowing 5ml of water three times. If no abnormalities are detected, Part 3 requires the patient to swallow 60ml of water, noting the time and signs of aspiration. Assessment: The total score (ranging from 18 to 46) is calculated. A higher score indicates more severe swallowing impairment.

Time frame
at baseline (pre-treatment), at 2 weeks after intervention, at 3-month follow-up]
2

Video fluroscopic swallowing study (VFSS)

Process: Patients will swallow barium-coated boluses of varying consistencies (liquid, semi-solid) under real-time X-ray (videofluoroscopy). The procedure is recorded for frame-by-frame analysis. Assessment: The primary metric from VFSS will be the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS ) score, which quantifies the depth and patient response to airway invasion. Additionally, the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale or component scores for oral and pharyngeal phase efficiency and safety may be used. A lower PAS score indicates better airway protection.

Time frame
at baseline (pre-treatment), at 2 weeks after intervention, at 3-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Surface electromyography (sEMG)

Process: Electrodes will be placed on the skin overlying the submental muscle group (suprahyoid muscles). Patients will perform swallowing tasks (e.g. saliva swallow, water swallow) while the electrical activity of these muscles is recorded. Assessment: 1. Submental Electromyography (sEMG) Peak Amplitude (microvolts, µV): An indicator of the intensity of muscle contraction during swallowing, reflecting the degree of muscle effort. 2. sEMG Burst Duration (milliseconds, ms): The time interval from the onset of muscle activation to its return to baseline levels, reflecting the coordination and efficiency of the swallowing act. 3. sEMG Swallowing Waveform Morphology: The overall shape and pattern of the electrical activity signal during swallowing (e.g. a smooth, single-peak curve vs. a fragmented, multi-peak curve), used to assess the coordination of neuromuscular control. Changes in these parameters reflect improvements in the coordination and efficiency of the swallowing musculature.

Time frame
at baseline (pre-treatment), at 2 weeks after intervention, at 3-month follow-up
2

Change in Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

Process: Using a 3.0T MRI scanner, high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical images and resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data will be acquired. During rs-fMRI, patients will remain awake, relaxed, and with their eyes open, without performing any specific task. Assessment: Analysis will focus on changes in functional connectivity (FC) within the swallowing network, particularly between the cerebellum, primary sensorimotor cortex, and brainstem. Regional changes in the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) or cerebral blood flow (CBF) will also be examined to identify alterations in local neural activity.

Time frame
at baseline (pre-treatment), at 2 weeks after intervention, at 3-month follow-up
3

Change in Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)

Process: A single-voxel MRS sequence will be performed. Voxels will be placed in key regions of interest (ROIs), including the bilateral swallowing motor cortex and the cerebellar hemispheres. Assessment: The concentrations of key neurometabolites-N-acetylaspartate (NAA, a marker of neuronal integrity), Choline (Cho, related to membrane turnover), Creatine (Cr, an energy reference), Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA, the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter), and Glutamate (Glu, the primary excitatory neurotransmitter)-will be quantified. Changes in ratios (e.g., NAA/Cr) or absolute concentrations will indicate neuroplastic and neurochemical changes.

Time frame
at baseline (pre-treatment), at 2 weeks after intervention, at 3-month follow-up
4

Change in Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG)

Process: A 32-channel digital EEG system will record brain electrical activity for at least 10 minutes in a resting state (eyes closed). Data will be carefully inspected to remove artifacts. Assessment: The power spectral density of key frequency bands (Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta) will be analyzed. Primary QEEG metrics will include the Brain Symmetry Index (BSI) to assess interhemispheric balance and the Delta + Theta/Alpha+Beta Ratio (DTABR), which serves as an indicator of overall brain arousal and cortical inefficiency. A decrease in DTABR suggests a shift towards a more alert and efficient brain state.

Time frame
at baseline (pre-treatment), at 2 weeks after intervention, at 3-month follow-up

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: