About this trial
Chronic neck pain can negatively affect daily activities, work ability, and quality of life. Cervical epidural block is commonly used to reduce pain and inflammation, while exercise and physical therapy aim to improve muscle strength, endurance, movement control, and physical function. However, there is limited evidence comparing cervical epidural block alone with its combined use with exercise or physical therapy.
This study aims to compare the effects of three treatment approaches in patients with chronic neck pain associated with cervical disc pathology or degenerative changes. Participants will receive cervical epidural block alone, cervical epidural block combined with cervical stabilization exercises, or cervical epidural block combined with physical therapy. Pain intensity, neck-related disability, and quality of life will be evaluated before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment using the Numeric Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. The study will determine whether adding exercise or physical therapy to cervical epidural block provides additional clinical and functional benefits.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Aged 18 to 55 years
Neck pain lasting longer than 3 months
Diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score of 5 or higher
Disqualifiers
History of spinal surgery
Cervical spondylolisthesis
Spinal stenosis
Presence of a neurological deficit
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection
Procedure/SurgeryParticipants receive a cervical epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic neck pain associated with cervical radiculopathy.
Cervical Stabilization Exercise Program
BehavioralParticipants perform a cervical stabilization exercise program in addition to cervical epidural steroid injection.
Physical Therapy Program
Other interventionParticipants receive a physical therapy program in addition to cervical epidural steroid injection.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Pain Intensity Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants rate their pain on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate lower pain intensity. Changes from baseline will be compared among the three treatment groups.
Secondary outcomes
Change in Neck-Related Disability Assessed by the Neck Disability Index
Neck-related disability will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The questionnaire consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 to 5, with a total score ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater neck-related disability. Changes from baseline will be compared among the three treatment groups.
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The questionnaire provides Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Changes from baseline will be compared among the three treatment groups.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Alİ Eman, MD
Lead sponsor
Sakarya University
Sponsor institution