ChOlecystectomy aFter successFul Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Extraction in Elderly

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age75+
SponsorHelsinki University Central Hospital

About this trial

The goal of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus wait-and-see policy after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in elderly. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome: Death or major postoperative complications or recurrent biliary disease within 1 year after randomization.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Common bile duct stones cleared after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP)

Age >= 80 years or age 75-79 years with a Charlson Comorbidity index >=2

gallbladder in situ

Disqualifiers

Acute Cholecystitis

Biliary Pancreatitis

Severe or moderately severe post-ERCP pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Procedure/Surgery

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 2 weeks after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stone

Treatment groups

400 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: CholecystectomyActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Wait-and-seeNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Number of participants with composite outcome of death, major complication or recurrent biliary event

The primary outcome is a composite outcome including death within 1 year after randomization, the occurrence of major complications within 30 days from surgery and recurrent biliary event requiring hospitalization. within 1 year after randomization. A recurrent biliary event refers to cholecystitis, pancreatitis, cholangitis, or bile duct stones. Major complications were defined as infectious, cardiovascular and pulmonary complications, and surgical complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher)

Time frame
From randomization to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of good days

Number of days alive and out of hospital

Time frame
From randomization to 1 year
2

EQ VAS value

Quality of life is measured using EuroQOL EQ-5D-5L instrument, EQ VAS values are compared. 0 represents the worst health a person can imagine and 100 represents the the best health a person can imagine. EQ-5D-5L dimension responses are reported as a descriptive data

Time frame
at 30 days, 180 days and 365 days after randomization
3

Survival

Survival is measured using Kaplan-Meier analysis

Time frame
From randomization to 1 year
4

Number of patients with major complications

Number of patients with major complications defined as infectious, cardiovascular, and pulmonary complications, and surgical complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher)

Time frame
From randomization to 1 year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.