This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the clinical and radiographic performance of injectable composite versus packable composite in restoring cavitated primary molars in children aged 4 to 8 years.
Study Purpose
To determine whether injectable composite performs as well as packable composite in Class II restorations in primary molars clinically and radiographically.
Children aged 4-8 years.
Medically free.
Restorable Class II cavities.
Asymptomatic tooth.
Uncooperative children.
Unable to attend follow-up visits.
Parents refuse to sign the informed consent.
Children participating in any other clinical trial involving fluoride therapy or other interventions that could directly influence caries development during the study period.
Parallel
packable composite
Other interventionpackable composite used to restore teeth and molars
injectable composite
Other interventiontype of zero flow injectable composite
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in The Restoration of Cavitated Primary Molars
Clinical evaluation will be done according to Fédération Dentaire Internationale FDI criteria Scores: Clinically excellent = 1 Clinically good = 2 Clinically sufficient = 3 Clinically unsatisfactory = 4 Clinically poor = 5
Radiographic Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in The Restoration of Cavitated Primary Molars.
radiographic assessment will be done by using bitewing x-ray
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Eslam samy abdel monaem kalboush
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Sponsor institution
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options:
