About this trial
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. It aims to investigate whether intensive transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAIC) followed by sequential intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) is clinically more effective than IVC alone in the treatment of unresectable colorectal cancer (uCRC).
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
Age ≥ 18 years old;
Histopathologically confirmed CRC adenocarcinoma;
Locally advanced CRC confirmed as clinical T4 stage on CT/MRI imaging, with or without synchronous liver metastases;
For patients with CRLM, hepatic tumor burden shall be lower than the burden of the primary colorectal lesion. Consequently, the multidisciplinary team (MDT) agree by consensus that CRC should be a priority target for treatment.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAIC)
Procedure/SurgeryTAIC can increase the local intra-tumoral concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents by intensifying drug delivery into the tumor via super-selective catheterization of the tumor-feeding artery, and meanwhile reduce systematic toxicity.
Intravenous Chemotherapy(IVC)
Procedure/SurgeryIntravenous administration of chemotherapeutic agents is the mainstay of chemotherapy.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Objective response rate
Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 for CRC and modified RECIST criteria for CRLM.
Secondary outcomes
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item QoL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items covering five functioning scales (physical, social, emotional, role, and cognitive), nine symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbances, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact), and a global health status scale. Referring to a recall period of one-week (except for physical function, which does not refer to a recall period at all), patients indicate their answers on a 4-point Likert scale. Linear converted scale scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the functioning scales and on the global health status scale indicate better functioning, whereas higher scores on the symptom scales indicate greater symptom burden.
Clinical complete response
Clinical complete response is defined as no visible tumor on imaging examination.
Pathological complete response
The pathological complete response is defined as the absence of invasive neoplastic cells upon microscopic examination of the tumor during surgery.
The rate of conversion to resectable status
Assessment of resectability represents a complex biological and technical decision; definitions of resectability vary substantially and are contingent on technical expertise, institutional surgical volume, institutional experience, and access to multidisciplinary oncological care. For the present clinical trial, the following resectability criteria will be applied: (i) Following 4 cycles of conversion therapy, simultaneous or staged complete surgical resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases can be performed. (ii) The primary lesion can be resected en bloc with R0 margins. (iii) Liver metastases can be treated with radical ablation alone or combined with radical surgical resection to achieve R0 margins; the future liver remnant constitutes no less than 30%-40% of the total liver volume. (iv) Patients maintain acceptable general status and have no additional distant metastases precluding local radical treatment. (v) Regional lymph node metastases are amenable to complete surg
Other outcomes
Adverse events
Adverse events (AEs) include chemotherapy-related and catheter-related complications, which will be graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 6.0.
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Lead sponsor
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
Collaborator
The Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center
Collaborator
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Collaborator
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University
Collaborator
The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao
Collaborator
The Central Hospital of Handan City
Collaborator
The First People's Hospital of Jiujiang City
Collaborator
Changzhi Medical College
Collaborator
Zibo Boshan District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital
Collaborator
Hebei Yixian Hospital
Collaborator
Baoding Mancheng District People's Hospital
Collaborator
The Shanghai Yangpu Central Hospital
Collaborator