Clinical Evaluation of Intuitive, Bidirectional Strategies for the Control of Multi-articulated Prostheses for Upper Limb Amputation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorScuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna

About this trial

The investigators propose to validate a non-invasive upper limb prosthesis capable of combining: 1) intuitive movement control through machine learning applied to myoelectric signals, and 2) vibrotactile sensory feedback in response to touch and object release events. The prosthesis is composed at the minimum of skin-surface electrodes for myoelectric signals, vibrotactile actuators, a multi-articulated and instrumented hand prosthesis and a centralized control system. Such system is validated for several weeks in non-supervised environments.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

subjects with transradial amputation, and minimum experience in the use of myoelectric prosthesis;

subjects who have expressed informed consent to participate in the study and consent to data processing.

Disqualifiers

subjects with obvious visual and oculomotor defects;

concomitant comorbidities/disabilities/chronic conditions, general or localized (Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, muscle tone disorders, malignant neoplasms, etc.), which may interfere with the performance of the study;

pregnancy or breastfeeding;

declared or evident cognitive deficits that compromise the understanding of the required tasks (mini Mental State Examination≤ 24);

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Prosthetic controller

    Device

    The intervention includes an upper limb prosthesis composed at the minimum by skin-surface electrodes for myoelectric signals, a vibrotactile actuator, a multi-articulated and instrumented hand prosthesis and a centralized control system. The centralized prosthetic controller processes the myoelectric signals acquired at the residual limb to enable the movements on the multi-articulated prosthesis.

Treatment groups

14 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: machine learning based prosthesis controlExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: conventional direct controlActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

The test consists of sequentially manipulating 6 lightweight and 6 heavyweight abstract objects and 14 activities of daily living over a specific formboard. Lightweight objects should be manipulated first. The task involves pushing a button to start a timer, picking up and moving the object from the rear slot to the front slot on the board, and completing the task by depressing the button on the timer again.

Time frame
Measured at the baseline with the clinical prosthesis already in use (if any), then measured at the first and last week of each home-trial. Lastly, measured again after at least 1 wash-out week from the last home-trial
2

Clothespin Relocation Test (CRT)

The objective is to evaluate the performance of a prosthetic user in a controlled environment and subsequently provide a measure of the user's expected functionality level outside the laboratory/clinic. The user is instructed to allocate three clothespins between a horizontal rod and a vertical rod and asked to fill out a post-test survey after five trials of the CRT.

Time frame
Measured at the baseline with the clinical prosthesis already in use (if any), then measured at the first and last week of each home-trial. Lastly, measured again after at least 1 wash-out week from the last home-trial
3

Pick and Lift Test (PLT)

The PLT measures motor coordination, i.e., the ability to coordinate the grip force and the load force while lifting an object, as well as the reliability of the recorded control signal while transporting the object. While the subject is sitting on a chair with the intact arm parallel to the trunk, and the amputated limb extending anteriorly on a table, he/she is asked to lift a small object from the table with the prosthesis.

Time frame
Measured at the baseline with the clinical prosthesis already in use (if any), then measured at the first and last week of each home-trial. Lastly, measured again after at least 1 wash-out week from the last home-trial
4

Virtual Egg Test (VET)

The VET resembles the task of transporting fragile and robust objects, thus requiring both gross and fine dexterity. The test is composed of 11 Virtual Eggs that collapse if the grasping force exceeds their breaking thresholds, ranging from 0.4 N to 11.5 N. The test aims to transport each Virtual Egg over the barrier in the centre of the test platform without breaking it and as fast as possible. The metrics measured during the test are combined and provide two indexes that evaluate, respectively, gross and fine dexterity.

Time frame
Measured at the baseline with the clinical prosthesis already in use (if any), then measured at the first and last week of each home-trial. Lastly, measured again after at least 1 wash-out week from the last home-trial

Secondary outcomes

1

NASA-TLX questionnaire

The NASA-TLX is a questionnaire to assess subjective workload, in terms of mental, physical, temporal, performance, effort and frustration. The resulting score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 means no workload (very easy) and 100 means maximum workload (extremely demanding).

Time frame
Administered after each functional test (primary outcomes). Measured at the baseline with the clinical prosthesis already in use (if any), then measured at the first and last week of each home-trial. Lastly, measured again at the end of the study
2

abilHAND-ULA

The abilHAND-ULA is a questionnaire for self-assessing the perceived manual ability for individuals with upper limb amputation. The cumulative score ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better manual ability.

Time frame
Administered before, after and at each week of the two home-trials
3

OPUS-UEFS

The Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey - Upper Extremity Functional Scale for Prosthesis Users (OPUS-UEFS) is a self-report measure designed to assess the functional status of individuals using upper limb prostheses, considering the level of amputation and prosthesis type. Each of the 23 items is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = cannot do this activity, 5 = very easy). The cumulative score ranges from 0 to 92, with higher scores indicating greater functional ability.

Time frame
Administered before, after and at each week of the two home-trials
4

TAPES

The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) is a self-administered questionnaire that comprises psychosocial adjustment, activity restriction, and prosthetic satisfaction domains, each with 3 subscales. Each subscale is scored individually, with higher scores consistently indicating more positive outcomes. Summing scores across different subscales is not appropriate.

Time frame
Administered before, after and at each week of the two home-trials

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna

Collaborator