Comparison and evaluation of the difference in clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture combined with surrounding acupuncture and sham electroacupuncture groups and control group (ice compress combined with brake rest group) in the treatment of ALAS by means of musculoskeletal ultrasound technique.
Meets the diagnostic criteria for a grade I or II injury;
Onset time≤48h;
The patient aged between18 and 60, gender is not limited;
The skin of the ankle joint on the affected side is intact, without breakage or ulceration;
Combined with ankle fracture;
Grade III injury or complete ligament rupture;
Those who cannot comply with the treatment program. Those with keloid, localized combination of other skin diseases, and those who are not suitable for electroacupuncture treatment;
Those with serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, hepatic, renal, hematopoietic system or systemic failure, connective tissue disease, hemophilia, diabetes mellitus, malignant tumors, and those who are prone to bleeding tendency.
Parallel
electroacupuncture combined with surrounding acupuncture
Other interventionelectroacupuncture combined with surrounding acupuncture
sham electroacupuncture
Other interventionsham electroacupuncture
ice compress combined with brake rest
Other interventionice compress combined with brake rest
Kofoed
The Kofoed evaluation system was divided into 3 items, which were evaluated before treatment, 3 weeks after treatment and after treatment. The ankle joint function was evaluated mainly from three aspects of pain, function and range of motion, with a total score of 100.
musculoskeletal ultrasound quantitative measurement
The thickness of lateral collateral ligament of ankle joint was measured by GE LOGIQ-e portable color Doppler ultrasonography before and after treatment. The frequency of linear array probe was 8 \~ 12 mHz.
circumference of ankle joint
The circumference of ankle joint was measured in 3 groups before, 3 weeks and after treatment.
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
