About this trial
This study is a prospective, single-center clinical study to evaluate the advantages, extensibility and safety of hydromorphone as an analgesic drug in ICU, and to compare it with remifentanil, a traditional sedative drug. These conclusions can guide us to understand the characteristics of analgesic drugs, carry out appropriate pain management, improve the status of ICU patients, and improve the quality of life of patients.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age ≥18 years and ≤75 years;
For patients requiring sedation and analgesia in ICU, invasive mechanical ventilation time is expected to be ≥24 hours;
Obtain informed consent from patients or family members.
Disqualifiers
Under 18 years of age, or over 75 years of age;
pregnancy or breastfeeding;
Known or suspected allergy to opioids (e.g., fentanyl, remifentanil, hydromorphone), butorphanol, midazolam.
General anesthesia surgery within 48 hours;
Trial population
ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation requiring analgesia and sedation
Trial design
Case-control
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
no-intervention
Other interventionno-intervention
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
RASS score
Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale score was used to assess the patient's calm state.The maximum value of the score table is 5 and the minimum value is - 4, indicating that the patient 's sedation level changes from ' coma ' to ' aggressive '.The higher the score, the worse the patient 's sedation depth and sedation quality.
CPOT score
Critical care Pain Observation Tool score is used to evaluate the degree of pain in critically ill patients.The maximum value of the score table is 10, and the minimum value is 0.The higher the score, the more serious the pain of the patient.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: