Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of EDL on Dyspepsia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorSeoul National University Bundang Hospital

About this trial

This clinical trial was designed to evaluate the functional and safety effects on dyspeptic symptoms compared to the placebo when ingested with EDL (Extract of Dolichos lablab Linne) in adults who complain of dyspeptic symptoms.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Those over the age of 19

Those diagnosed with functional dyspepsia (Rome IV*)

Othersome postprandial fullness

Unpleasant early satiation

Disqualifiers

Persons who are currently being treated with severe cardiovascular system, immune system, respiratory system, hepatobiliary system, kidney and urinary system, nervous system, musculoskeletal system, mental, infectious diseases, and malignant tumors (however, considering the condition of the subjects, subjects can participate in the test according to investigator's judgment.)

Persons with a history of peptic ulcer and reflux esophagitis within 6 months of Visit 1

Those who have gastrointestinal surgery (except appendectomy and hemorrhoidectomy)

Persons with a history of malignancy of the digestive system

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Extract of Dolichos lablab Linne (EDL)

    Dietary supplement

    Investigational product (EDL): once a day, 2 tablets orally intake (Extract of Dolichos lablab Linne 715 mg/day)

  • Placebo oral tablet

    Other intervention

    Placebo: consumed in the same way as the investigational product

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: EDL(Extract of Dolichos lablab Linne)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Placebo comparatorPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

GSRS(Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) Stomach symptom score

GSRS (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) Stomach symptom score change after 12 weeks of administration, compared to Baseline. * the unabbreviated scale title: Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale * the minimum and maximum values: 0, 24 * higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

GSRS(Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) Stomach symptom score

GSRS (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) Stomach symptom score change after 6 weeks of administration, compared to Baseline. * the unabbreviated scale title: Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale * the minimum and maximum values: 0, 24 * higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
6 weeks
2

GSRS(Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) Total score

GSRS (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) Total score change after 6 weeks, 12 weeks of administration, compared to Baseline. * the unabbreviated scale title: Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale * the minimum and maximum values: 0, 45 * higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
6 weeks, 12 weeks
3

GIS(Gastrointestinal Symptom)

GIS(Gastrointestinal Symptom) score change after 6 weeks, 12 weeks of administration, compared to Baseline. * the unabbreviated scale title: Gastrointestinal Symptom * the minimum and maximum values: 0, 40 * higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
6 weeks, 12 weeks
4

FD-QoL(Functional Dyspepsia-Related Quality of Life)

FD-QoL(Functional Dyspepsia-Related Quality of Life) score change after 12 weeks of administration, compared to Baseline. * the unabbreviated scale title: Functional Dyspepsia-Related Quality of Life * the minimum and maximum values: 0, 84 * higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
12 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.