Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. The efficacy of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain 2. The safety of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain Participants are going to undergo procedure that implant peripheral nerve stimulation electrode produced by Jiangsu CED Medtech Co., Ltd. Then the subjects, whose VAS scores decrease more 30% than baseline level, are classified into two groups randomly. One of the group receiving active stimulation called trial group and another receiving placebo stimulation called control group. All subjects are required to make their own subjects' pain diary to record VSA score before and after implantation until at the end of follow-up. Also, participants are asked to report use of analgesic medications, number of awakenings and adverse events.

Researchers will compare pain scores between the two groups to see if peripheral nerve stimulation is effective to patients with peripheral neuropathic pain.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18 years old and above, male or female

Diagnosed by trained clinical doctors as postherpetic neuralgia, which is an indication for peripheral nerve stimulation therapy;

Assess the damage or disease of the peripheral sensory system through the four questions of Douleur Neuropathy before surgery;

The subject has received conventional treatment but the efficacy is poor, or cannot tolerate the side effects of conventional treatment;

Disqualifiers

Subjects who need to receive both radio frequency modulation and intrathecal drug infusion treatment simultaneously;

Subjects who are known to have cardiac implants (pacemakers or defibrillators) or other implantable neural stimulators (spinal cord stimulators or deep brain stimulators, etc.);

Subjects with severe psychological and/or mental disorders and/or non therapeutic drug dependence;

Subjects expected to undergo MRI examination within 30 days after PNS implantation;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Active electrostimulation

    Device

    Maintain the electrical stimulation state, and according to the patient's feeling to set the appropriate stimulation parameter range (pain relief and no obvious numbness and discomfort), the programme will be written into the patient's self-control remote control, by the patient according to their own pain situation for the independent control of the stimulation current.

  • Placebo electrostimulation

    Device

    No actual electrostimulation

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Participants receiving active electrostimulation after implantation procedureExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Participants receiving placebo electrostimulation after implantation procedurePlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Difference in mean pain visual analogue scale VAS scores between trial and control groups in the randomised withdrawal period

Researchers will collect visual analogue scale scores of 7 days after the implantation of peripheral nerve stimulation electrode to calculate mean scores of 4 days before randomized withdrawal and evaluate the difference in pain improvement of peripheral nerve stimulation between the two groups (trial and control group) by analyzing the mean change in VAS scores during randomized withdrawal period.

Time frame
every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period)
2

Visual simulation assessment scale collects pain scores after peripheral electrode placement

Researchers collected daily pain scores from the day of peripheral nerve stimulation electrode implantation until removal using the VAS pain scale, as well as pain scores on the 14th day after electrode removal.

Time frame
Every day from 7 to 28 days after electrode implantation, as well as the 14th day after electrode removal

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of subjects whose pain relief more than 30%

The VAS scores recorded in pain diary by participants during randomized withdrawal period decreased more 30% than baseline period.

Time frame
Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period)
2

Proportion of subjects of ideal pain state

The VAS scores recorded in pain diary by participants during test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period less than forty millimeters.

Time frame
Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period)
3

Sleep-related assessment after electrostimulation

The number of awakenings in sleep diary by participants during test period, randomized withdrawal period and observation period.

Time frame
Every day for 7 days after electrode implantation (test period), every day from 7 to 14 days after electrode implantation (randomized withdrawal period), and every day from 14 to 28 days after electrode implantation (observation period)
4

Change of life quality after electrostimulation

The subjects will be asked to fulfill the Mos 36-item Short Form Health Survey with assistance of clinical physician.

Time frame
4 days before electrode implantation, 7, 14, 21, 28 days after electrode implantation, and 14 days after electrode removal.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Lead sponsor

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Collaborator

The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province

Collaborator

Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Collaborator