Co-designing and Evaluating a Real-world Implementation Model for Remote Consultation with Vision Self-testing.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age4+
SponsorCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

About this trial

This study aims to involve the public, patients and National Health Service (NHS) staff in co-designing a scalable, inclusive and sustainable implementation model for ophthalmic remote consultation with vision self-testing (the intervention). The main study questions are:

What are the barriers to uptake of the intervention and how can these be mitigated by the design of the implementation model.

How do implementation outcome measures compare before and after real world application of the model.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients 4 years and older scheduled by their clinician for a follow up remote eye clinic consultation following an initial face-to face consultation.

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

patients will reflect the diversity of the eye clinic population in terms of gender, age, social deprivation, ethnicity and sub-specialty eye condition.

Trial design

Design model

Case-only

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • online questionnaires

    Other intervention

    Before and after online questionnaires

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Patient participants1 intervention
Group B: Staff participants1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in patient reported perceived attributes of e-health innovation score

Change in the perceived attributes of e-health innovation score before and after experiencing remote consultation and self-testing of vision. This questionnaire results in a summated score for each patient with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Change in overall score before and after the remote consultation will be calculated for each patient and a mean change in score calculated. A higher magnitude positive change in score reflects an improved perception of the technology after the experience.

Time frame
30 months
2

Change in staff reported normalisation measure of the technology (NoMAD) score

Change in the NoMAD score before and after implementation of the remote consultation and self-testing of vision.This questionnaire results in a summated score for each patient with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. Change in overall score before and after service implementation the remote consultation will be calculated for each member of staff and a mean change in score calculated. A higher magnitude positive change in score reflects improved normalisation and acceptance of the technology after implementation.

Time frame
30 months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Lead sponsor

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Collaborator

University of East Anglia

Collaborator

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Collaborator