About this trial
The purpose of this feasibility clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and usability of central thalamic deep brain stimulation (CT-DBS) for use in patients with chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to explore its potential effects on cognitive and functional outcomes.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
History of moderate to severe TBI based on estimated worst Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score within first 48 hours of injury (acceptable GCS range = 3-12)
Age ≥18 and <75 years at the time of informed consent.
At least 24 months from date of TBI injury
Fluent in local language and able to independently provide consent
Disqualifiers
History of major developmental, neurologic, psychiatric or substance use disorder with evidence of disability prior to onset of TBI
Any DSM-5 personality disorder diagnosis, as determined by SCID-5-PD, will exclude the participant.
Major medical co-morbidities: end stage renal failure, heart failure, severe congestive heart disease, coagulopathy, severe respiratory problems, liver failure, uncontrolled hypertension or other significant medical co-morbidities.
Receiving anti-epileptic medications to control active seizures
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Deep brain stimulation
DeviceDelivery of continuous, low-voltage electrical pulses to deep portions of the brain via an implantable pacemaker-like device.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Device and Procedure Safety
Proportion of participants experiencing at least one device or procedure related serious adverse event (SAE) from implantation through Day 90 after stimulation activation, including events such as intracranial hemorrhage, infection requiring explant or IV antibiotics, lead or hardware complications requiring surgical intervention, or other SAEs judged related to the DBS system, implantation procedure, or stimulation therapy.
Secondary outcomes
Overall Safety
Overall incidence of all adverse events (serious and non serious), summarized by MedDRA system organ class and preferred term, severity, and relationship to device/procedure from implantation through Day 90 after stimulation activation.
Other outcomes
Change in Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B)
Trail Making Test Part B is a standardized neuropsychological test of executive function, cognitive flexibility, divided attention, and processing speed. Participants are asked to connect alternating numbers and letters in sequence as quickly as possible; completion time in seconds is recorded, with longer times indicating worse performance. Change from baseline in TMT-B completion time will be summarized descriptively to explore trajectories of cognitive performance after neuromodulation and to inform effect size assumptions and endpoint selection for a subsequent pivotal study. This outcome is exploratory and will not be used for formal hypothesis testing
Change in Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ)
The RPQ is a 16-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the severity of post-concussive symptoms. Higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Change from baseline will be summarized descriptively to explore trajectories of symptom burden after neuromodulation and to inform endpoint selection and effect size assumptions for a subsequent pivotal study. This outcome is exploratory and will not be used for formal hypothesis testing
Change in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) - Global Disability Score
WHODAS 2.0 is a validated instrument developed by the World Health Organization to assess disability across multiple domains, including cognition, mobility, self-care, interpersonal interactions, life activities, and participation. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ("none" to "extreme"), and the global disability score is derived from item responses, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Change from baseline in the WHODAS 2.0 global disability score will be analyzed descriptively to characterize trajectories of functional disability after neuromodulation and to inform endpoint selection, effect size assumptions, and assessment timing for a subsequent pivotal study. This outcome is exploratory and will not be used for formal hypothesis testing.
Change in Multidomain Composite Endpoint (Continuous Score)
The multidomain composite endpoint at Day 90 is a continuous score summarizing performance across four prespecified component measures: (1) Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) Behavioral subscale, (2) RPQ Cognitive subscale, (3) Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) completion time, and (4) World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) global disability score. Each component will be standardized (e.g., converted to z-scores, with directionality aligned so that higher composite scores reflect better overall status or lower overall impairment) and combined into a single multidomain composite score. The Day 90 multidomain composite endpoint is intended to estimate the average multidomain treatment effect of neuromodulation on cognitive symptoms, behavioral/emotional symptoms, objective cognitive performance, and global disability. It will be analyzed as a continuous outcome (e.g., change from baseline) and used descriptively in this study.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: