About this trial
The behavioral within-subject cross-over design study "CoVa" aims to investigate the effect of a short-term full-body cold-water immersion vs. warm-water immersion control on value-based choice, psychological well-being, and peripheral physiology.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
18-40 years of age
Consent to participate
Fluency in German
Physically and mentally healthy
Disqualifiers
Raynaud syndrome
Cold urticaria
High resting heart rate (>160 beats per minute)
Acute infection
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Cold-water immersion
BehavioralSingle 10-minute acute full-body head-out single arm-out cold-water immersion at 10-16°C on the experimental day
Warm-water immersion (Control)
BehavioralSingle 10-minute acute full-body head-out single arm-out cold-water immersion at 30-36°C on the experimental day
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Risk propensity
Risk propensity, i.e., the ratio between risky and non-risky choices for each monetary value as measured in the risk decision-making task in the cold-water vs warm-water condition as described in Liu et al. (2021)
Behavioral range adaptation
Participants will perform a computer-based reinforcement learning task described in Gueguen et al. (2024) to assess reward sensitivity in different monetary contexts. Behavioral range adaptation, which reflects value range-dependent, relative reward valuation, may be altered if reward processing itself is changed through a potent shift in the physiological state. To test whether reward processing is altered after cold vs warm water exposure, the extent to which range adaptation and reference-point centering occurs will be quantified using computational modeling methods.
Food choice
Participants will be provided an ad libitum restaurant-like breakfast meal during which they can order various food items (e.g., bread, yogurts, cookies) in the desired amount. The ingested food type, nutritional value, and amount will be quantified to assess food preference after cold vs warm water exposure by linking the consumed food with a standardized food database (German Nutrient Database, Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel).
Heart-rate variability
Task-based and resting-state heart-rate variability, measured with a three-point electrocardiogram (ECG)
Secondary outcomes
Trait autonomy questionnaire
Trait autonomy is assessed via the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS). Measures range from 1 (not at all true) to 5 (totally true) with 5 indicating the highest score.
Emotion regulation questionnaire
Emotion regulation, assessed via the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Measures range from 1 (not at all true) to 7 (totally true) with 7 indicating the highest score.
Causality orientation questionnaire
Causality orientation, assessed via the General Causality Orientations Scale (GCOS). Measures range from 1 (very unlikely) to 6 (very likely) with 6 indicating the highest probability of responding as the item describes in the vignette scenario.
Delay discounting questionnaire
Delay discounting is assessed via the Delay Discounting Test by Kirby. Response options to each item are binary with one option corresponding to an immediate reward (e.g., 14 EUR today) and the second option corresponding to a higher but delayed reward (e.g., 19 EUR in 60 days).
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.