Colectomy Reconstruction for Ulcerative Colitis, Ileorectal Anastomosis vs Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Ulcerative Colitis.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-60
SponsorLinkoeping University

About this trial

Background There are no prospective trials comparing the two main reconstructive options after colectomy for Ulcerative colitis, ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis. An attempt on a randomized controlled trial has been made but after receiving standardized information patients insisted on choosing operation themselves.

Methods Adult Ulcerative colitis patients subjected to colectomy eligible for both ileal pouch anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis are asked to participate and after receiving standardized information the get to choose reconstructive method. Patients not declining reconstruction or not considered eligible for both methods will be followed as controls. The CRUISE study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, controlled trial on satisfaction, QoL, function, and complications between ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis.

Discussion Reconstruction after colectomy is a morbidity-associated as well as a resource-intensive activity with the sole purpose of enhancing function, Quality of Life and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to provide the best possible information on the risks and benefits of each reconstructive treatment.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with Ulcerative colitis (UC) aged between 18 and 60

Scheduled for or have previously undergone subtotal colectomy and ileostomy.

Patients should have sufficient rectal compliance and controllable inflammation in the rectal using topical Mezalasin only.

Disqualifiers

Rectal inflammation of Mayo Score >1

Poor sphincter function, perianal disease

Uncertainty regarding UC diagnosis P

Previous colorectal cancer or severe dysplasia

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ileorectal anastomosis (IRA)

    Procedure/Surgery

    After subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis the patients can either keep their end ileostomy or be reconstructed with an anastomosis (connection) between the ileum and the rectal remnant (Ileorectal anastomosis(IRA))

  • Ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA)

    Procedure/Surgery

    The rectum is removed and a pouch constructed with the distal part opf the ileum which in subsequently anastomosed (connected) to the anus(Ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA)).

  • ileostomy

    Procedure/Surgery

    no reconstruction is performed and the patient is left with his/her ileostomy

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 5 treatment groups
Group A: IPAA CRUISEExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: IRA CRUISEExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: IRA ControlActive comparator 1 intervention
Group D: IPAA ControlActive comparator 1 intervention
Group E: Ileostomy ControlActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Patient satisfaction

yes/no question if the patient is satisfied with his/her choice of operation

Time frame
2months
2

Patient satisfaction

yes/no question if the patient is satisfied with his/her choice of operation

Time frame
1year
3

Patient satisfaction

yes/no question if the patient is satisfied with his/her choice of operation

Time frame
5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

SF-36(short form-36 item)

The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability

Time frame
2 months
2

SF-36(short form-36 item)

The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability

Time frame
6 months
3

SF-36(short form-36 item)

The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability

Time frame
1 year
4

SF-36(short form-36 item)

The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability

Time frame
2 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Linkoeping University

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital

Collaborator

Göteborg University

Collaborator

University College London Hospitals

Collaborator