About this trial
This study aims to (i) assess the effects of combined tDCS and cognitive training on decision-making on a trained task (Iowa Gambling Task; IGT); and (ii) test generalization to a closely related cognitive domain, namely motor impulsivity. It is hypothesized that combined anodal tDCS and cognitive training will result in more advantageous decisions and better impulse control than combined sham tDCS and cognitive training.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Consenting volunteers aged between 18 and 40.
Disqualifiers
Individuals with epilepsy, other neurological conditions and history of significant head injury will be excluded.
Individuals with a history of substance misuse, major mental disorder and those receiving psychotropic medication will be also excluded.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Other interventionNon-invasive brain stimulation
Cognitive training
BehavioralIowa Gambling Task will be used for cognitive training
Sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Other interventionNon-invasive brain stimulation
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) net scores
IGT is a measure of decision making under conditions of uncertainty and risk.
Secondary outcomes
Stop Signal Task (SST) reaction time
SST is a measure of inhibitory control
Urgency, Perseveration, Premeditation, Sensation Seeking + Positive Urgency (UPPS+P) Impulsive Behavior Scale total scores
UPPS+P is a 59 item self-report measure of trait impulsivity. Each item is rated on a scale of 1-4 (1= totally disagree, 4=totally agree) yielding a total score out of 216 (range=59 - 216) Higher scores denote higher impulsivity.
Abbreviated Profile of Mood States (POMS) Total Mood Disturbance score
Abbreviated POMS is a 40-item measure of current mood states. Each item is rated on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all, 4=Extremely). The total Mood Disturbance score is calculated by summing the totals for the negative subscales (tension, depression, anger, fatigue, confusion) and then subtracting the totals for the positive subscales (vigour, esteem related affect) and then adding a constant 100. Higher scores denote greater mood disturbance.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Dr. Najat Khalifa
Lead sponsor
Queen's University
Sponsor institution
University of Nottingham
Collaborator