Combined Intervention of Long-term Letter Mentoring and Centralized Summer Camp by University Student Volunteers for Disadvantaged Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age10-16
SponsorXiaoxuan Liu

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a combined intervention of summer camp and letter-writing support works to improve psychological resilience in disadvantaged adolescents in Liangshan, Sichuan. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the "summer camp + letter-writing" intervention improve resilience in adolescents who face poverty, lack of parental care, or social risks?

Does this intervention reduce depression and anxiety symptoms?

Researchers will compare adolescents who join the summer camp and receive monthly letters to those who do not receive this program to see if the intervention helps their mental health and coping skills.

Participants will:

Attend a 5-day summer camp that includes group games, emotion expression activities, life education, and learning support

Receive monthly letters from trained university student volunteers for about 10 months after the camp. The letters will encourage them, give advice, and help them practice what they learned in the camp

Complete surveys about their resilience, depression, and anxiety before the intervention, during it, at the end, and 6 months later

This study will also look at whether the program is cost-effective, meaning if it brings mental health benefits at a reasonable cost.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Students enrolled in Grade 7 or Grade 8 (junior middle school) in selected schools in Yuexi County, Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province.

Identified as "children in adversity," including those from economically disadvantaged families, left-behind children, children with disabilities, or other children deemed at-risk by school officials.

Able to understand and complete psychological questionnaires.

Mentally and physically able to participate in group activities and engage in written communication.

Disqualifiers

Children with serious psychiatric or developmental disorders (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability) that impair comprehension or participation.

Currently receiving professional psychological counseling or treatment that may interfere with the study protocol.

Participation in other mental health interventions in the past year.

Planning to transfer, drop out, or leave the region during the study period.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Combined Resilience Intervention

    Behavioral

    A two-phase behavioral intervention aimed at improving psychological resilience among socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents. The intervention includes: 1. a 5-day structured summer camp led by trained university student volunteers, featuring psychoeducational group sessions, emotional expression activities, and life skills training, based on SEL, CBT, and positive psychology frameworks; and 2. a 10-month pen-pal letter-writing component, where each child is matched with a trained university volunteer to receive monthly supportive letters. This stage reinforces the gains from the summer camp through sustained emotional support, skill reminders, and positive guidance. The intervention is designed to be low-cost, scalable, and ethically safe, and has been standardized through manuals and training protocols.

Treatment groups

497 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control GroupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Psychological resilience (RSCA score) at post-intervention

Psychological resilience will be assessed using the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents (RSCA), a 27-item validated instrument measuring five dimensions of resilience. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and the total score ranges from 27 to 135, with higher scores indicating greater resilience.

Time frame
At baseline (1 month before intervention), mid-intervention (Month 6), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17)

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to follow-up (PHQ-9)

Depressive symptoms will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a validated screening tool for depressive symptoms. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. Clinically significant depression is defined as a score ≥10.

Time frame
At baseline (1 month before intervention), mid-intervention (Month 6), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17)
2

Change in anxiety symptoms from baseline to follow-up (GAD-7)

Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), a validated self-report measure for generalized anxiety. Each item is rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. A score of ≥10 is considered clinically significant.

Time frame
At baseline (1 month before intervention), mid-intervention (Month 6), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17)
3

Change in mobile device addiction symptoms from baseline to follow-up (SAS-SV)

Digital device addiction will be assessed using the Short Version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS-SV), adapted for general mobile device use. The scale includes 10 items rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater risk of device addiction. A total score above 32 is considered indicative of problematic use.

Time frame
Baseline (T0): 1 month before summer camp Post-intervention (T2): Month 11 Follow-up (T3): Month 17

Other outcomes

1

Change in life satisfaction from baseline to follow-up

Life satisfaction will be assessed using a brief validated adolescent life satisfaction scale. Participants rate their overall satisfaction with life on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction.

Time frame
At baseline (1 month before intervention), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17)
2

Change in future orientation from baseline to follow-up

Participants' future orientation will be assessed using a brief validated scale measuring goal-setting, planning, and optimism toward future outcomes. Higher scores reflect stronger future orientation.

Time frame
At baseline (1 month before intervention), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17)

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Xiaoxuan Liu

Lead sponsor

Zhejiang University

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: