About this trial
The Community Popular Opinion Leader (CPOL) is an intervention dveloped in the United States which identifies, trains, and enlists key opinion leaders within communities to deliver messages to peers and help link them to services. This project involves testing the feasibility and acceptability of such a localized version of the CPOL intervention in rural South Africa. This will be achieved through a pilot intervention in three purposively selected communities in the Hlabisa sub-district of uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal. The investigators will select potential peer leaders in three ways (at random; based on nominations by peers; based on statistical analysis of previously collected social network data). Peer leaders will be invited to attend four weekly training sessions to learn about HIV prevention and persuasive communication. They will then be coached to start HIV prevention conversations with peers, including provision of HIV self-test kits and linkage to healthcare services. The investigators will evaluate this pilot using group discussions, in-depth interviews and brief pre/post questionnaires with session facilitators, peer leaders, contacted peers and healthcare providers. The investigators will analyse the data collected with the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) dissemination and implementation framework, identifying factors likely to affect Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM).
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Resident in Sixhumene study area household
Disqualifiers
Unable to provide informed consent
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
CPOL group training
BehavioralTrained research assistants will deliver four two-hour training sessions to a group of \~20 young adults, leading to the trainees providing sexual health information and HIV self-tests (with onward self-referral to local clinics) to their friends and close contacts. Sessions include training on local sexual health information, effective communication strategies, practice conversations and feedback.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Number of HIV self-tests distributed
The mean number of HIV self-tests distributed to peers by trainees
Secondary outcomes
Number of peer conversations held
Mean number of conversations trainees report holding with peers
Trainee HIV ART knowledge improvement
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 5-item ART knowledge question set \[range 0-5; higher = better\]
Trainee HIV PrEP knowledge improvement
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 5-item PrEP knowledge question set \[range 0-5; higher = better\]
Trainee generalized self-efficacy improvement
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on the Generalized Self Efficacy-short form (GSE 6) scale \[range 6-24; higher = better\]
Other outcomes
Barriers and Facilitators to Participant Engagement Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Process evaluation of participant engagement using qualitative methods. Data will be collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and peers. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement, participation, and intervention reach.
Trainee Confidence in Conducting Peer Conversations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees. Qualitative thematic analysis will explore participants' confidence in initiating and conducting peer conversations following the training programme.
Facilitators and Barriers to Peer Conversations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees. Qualitative thematic analysis will identify perceived facilitators and barriers influencing the conduct of peer conversations.
Perceptions of the Training Programme Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and trainers. Qualitative thematic analysis will explore acceptability, perceived value, strengths, and limitations of the training programme.
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Africa Health Research Institute
Lead sponsor
University College, London
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: