About this trial
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been one of the topmost global health problems. It is an underdiagnosed disease which have a huge burden on healthcare if left untreated. Almost 80-90% of adults are underdiagnosed of OSA Obesity primarily is one of the supreme risk factors for developing OSA. Globally, obesity cases have risen affecting almost two billion people. According to National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019, 1 in 2 adults in Malaysia were overweight or obese. Report from World Obesity Atlas 2023 predicts that adult obesity will rise 4.7% annually from 2020 - 2035, while child obesity will increase by 5.3% per year over similar timeline. Overweight individuals will have a significant economic impact on Malaysia's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2035 by 2.8% which is estimated to be about RM 3.2 trillion.
Sequalae of OSA is divided into two (cardiovascular-metabolic effect and neurocognitive effect). This group of patients are at high risk of developing hypertension, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia which then leads to pulmonary hypertension and heart failure. More importantly, from the neurocognitive point of view, persistent sleep deprivation will lead to poor concentration, impaired memory, personality changes affecting overall self-performance which can lead to depression and compromising safety as they have higher risk of work-related accidents.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Aged ≥ 18 years.
Patients diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA (based on AHI classification from sleep study performed).
Patients who are able to understand and answer the questionnaire given.
Disqualifiers
Patients who are unable to give consent to the study.
Patients who have been diagnosed with OSA and already on CPAP machine.
Patients who had underlying Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS).
Patients who had underlying co-morbidities that worsen apnea symptoms, such as congestive cardiac failure, active malignancy, narcolepsy, active alcohol or drug abuse, treatment-refractory dementia, psychotic illness and active use of drugs that disturb the sleep architecture (i.e hypnotics or stimulants of central nervous system).
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
CPAP Airsense 10 vs Air-Mini
DevicePatients' satisfaction and CPAP efficacy
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
To compare the overall satisfaction using Visual Analogue Score 100mm among moderate to severe OSA participants receiving conventional CPAP Airsense 10 (0 mm - Not Satisfied at all, 100mm - Very Satisfied)
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Airsence 10
To compare the overall satisfaction using Visual Analogue Score 100mm among moderate to severe OSA participants receiving CPAP Air-Mini. (0 mm - Not Satisfied at all, 100mm - Very Satisfied)
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Air Mini
Secondary outcomes
To evaluate the efficacy of CPAP machine Airsense 10 in terms of percentage AHI reduction (Optimal titration=AHI <5, Good titration=AHI ≤10 or by 50%, Adequate titration= AHI reduction by 75% from baseline)
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Airsense 10
To evaluate the efficacy of CPAP machine Air-Mini 10 in terms of percentage AHI reduction (Optimal titration=AHI <5, Good titration=AHI ≤10 or by 50%, Adequate titration= AHI reduction by 75% from baseline)
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Air-Mini
To determine the average 95th centile pressure required using conventional CPAP Airsense 10
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Airsence 10
To determine the average 95th centile pressure required using CPAP Air-Mini
Participants with moderate to severe OSA who underwent CPAP trial using CPAP Air-Mini
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.