Comparative Effects of Strain-counterstrain and Muscle Energy Techniques on Neck Pain and Functional Disability in Patients with Cervicogenic Headache

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-60
SponsorUniversity of Faisalabad

About this trial

The primary objective of this study is to compare effects of SCS and METs on reduction of neck pain intensity and improvement in functional disability in individuals with CGH. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of both techniques on ROM in cervical spine

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

participants who fulfill the criteria of international headache society.

Disqualifiers

participants who have cervicogenic headache after cervical injury or head surgery.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Strain-counterstrain

    Other intervention

    This is a technique that uses gentle body positioning passively to treat muscles and joints pain. So, this can be effective for neck pain in patients with CGH

  • Muscle energy techniques

    Other intervention

    This technique uses patient's own muscles to treat muscles and joint restrictions. So, this technique can be prove affective for neck pain and limited range in patients with CGH

Treatment groups

54 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: 1Active comparator 1 intervention
Group B: 2Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Visual analogue scale

To check pain intensity

Time frame
3 weeks
2

Neck disability index

To check functional disability

Time frame
3 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Goniometer

To measure range of motion

Time frame
3 weeks

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: