COMPARE-VENT Feasibility Pilot Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMayo Clinic

About this trial

Cardiac disease complicated by respiratory insufficiency comprises the most frequent indication for cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admission, with nearly one-third patients requiring advanced respiratory support and over 20% patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). IMV among patients with impaired cardiovascular reserve is further compounded by the adverse impact of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and systemic sedation on intracardiac hemodynamics, pulmonary vascular mechanics and consequently end-organ perfusion. Despite widespread use, evidence guiding optimal ventilatory practices and mode selection in cardiovascular intensive care unit patients remains limited. Pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation may differ in their effects on patient-ventilator synchrony, sedation requirements, and hemodynamic impact, but comparative data among patients with critical cardiac disease remains inconclusive. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of implementing a pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial comparing ventilatory modes in a contemporary cardiovascular intensive care unit.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

SCAI Stages C-E Cardiogenic Shock

Mechanical circulatory support use, including intra-aortic balloon pumps and microaxial flow pumps, including Impella CP, RP Impella Flex, and Impella 5.5 devices

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: LVEF <40% or;

Moderate to severe RV systolic dysfunction or;

Disqualifiers

Expected duration of intubation <12 hours.

Severe COPD, bronchopleural fistulas, or severe ARDS (Berlin criteria P/F <100, in the absence of pulmonary edema)

Home ventilator or chronic tracheostomy.

Pregnant, incarcerated, patients or those receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Volume Controlled Mode

    Other intervention

    Volume-controlled mode for continuous mandatory ventilation with preset inspiratory flow and tidal volume.

  • Pressure Controlled Mode

    Other intervention

    Pressure-controlled mode for continuous mandatory ventilation with preset inspiratory pressure above positive end-expiratory pressure.

Treatment groups

75 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Pressure Controlled VentilationActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Volume-Controlled VentilationActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Adherance to assigned study mode (Feasibility Outcome)

Percentage of time spent on the assigned study mode while receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the cardiac ICU between enrollment and 48 hours after enrollment.

Time frame
Enrollment to 48 hours
2

Time From Enrollment to Initiation of Assigned Mode of Mechanical Ventilation (Feasibility Outcome)

Time (number of hours) taken to initiate participants from enrollment (cardiac ICU admission) to initiation of assigned study mode of invasive mechanical ventilation upto 48 hours after enrollment.

Time frame
Enrollment to 48 Hours

Secondary outcomes

1

In-hospital Mortality (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)

All-cause, 28-day, in-hospital mortality, defined as death from any cause occurring between enrollment and 28 days after enrollment.

Time frame
Enrollment to Study Day 28
2

Ventilator-Free Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)

The number of calendar days between enrollment and 28 days after enrollment, on which the patient is alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Time frame
Enrollment to Study Day 28
3

Organ Failure Free Survival Days (Exploratory Clinical Outcome)

The number of calendar days between enrollment and 28 days after enrollment, on which the patient is alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, mechanical circulatory and vasoactive medication support.

Time frame
Enrollment to Study Day 28
4

Vasoactive-inotrope score (Exploratory Hemodynamic Outcome)

The Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) is a quantitative measure of the total cardiovascular support a patient receives through vasopressors and inotropes, by a standardized conversion to per-kilogram per-minute units. Higher VIS indicates greater dependence on pharmacologic support and is associated with worse outcomes.

Time frame
Enrollment to 48 hours

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.