Comparing Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) and Aerobika in Treating Bronchiectasis in Korea

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorChungbuk National University Hospital

About this trial

Title:

Comparison of Effectiveness Between Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) and Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP, Aerobika) Device Assisted Treatment in Patients With Bronchiectasis in Korea: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose:

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) alone versus ACBT combined with an Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device (Aerobika) in patients with bronchiectasis. The goal is to determine whether the combination therapy reduces the frequency of acute exacerbations and improves patient symptoms compared to ACBT alone.

Primary Questions:

Does the use of ACBT plus Aerobika reduce the number of acute exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis who experience ≥3 exacerbations per year?

What symptoms and adverse events are observed in participants using the Aerobika device?

Study Design:

This is a single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at Chungbuk National University Hospital in Korea. 100 adult patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis and having ≥3 acute exacerbations within 1 year will be enrolled and randomized into two groups (1:1):

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group

Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group

The intervention period lasts 12 months, with clinic visits scheduled at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Participation Involves:

Use of ACBT with or without Aerobika daily for 12 months

In-person clinic visits every 1 to 3 months

Monthly phone follow-ups to assess symptoms and adverse events

Completion of questionnaires (mMRC, BHQ, CAT) and clinical tests including PFT and laboratory tests

Tracking of exacerbation frequency, sputum volume, and quality

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18 years of age or older

Patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis involving one or more lobes on chest computed tomography (CT)

Patients experiencing frequent exacerbations (3 or more exacerbations) within 1 year

Patients able and willing to use the Aerobika device (OPEP)

Disqualifiers

Diagnosis of bronchiectasis due to cystic fibrosis

Traction bronchiectasis due to interstitial lung disease (ILD)

Pregnant patients

Patients with a history of OPEP device use

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group

    Device

    Patients with bronchiectasis using ACT and OPEP simultaneously

  • Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group

    Device

    Patients will receive only ACBT for airway clearance.

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Frequency of Acute Exacerbations in Patients with Bronchiectasis

Number of acute exacerbations experienced by patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis during the 12-month study period.

Time frame
12 months from baseline

Secondary outcomes

1

Improvement in subjective symptoms (1)

Evaluation of reductions from baseline in patients' self-reported symptoms (using Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale score) assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (range: 0-4; higher scores indicate worse dyspnea)

Time frame
Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
2

Improvement in subjective symptoms (2)

Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' self-reported symptoms (using Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) score) assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (range: 0-100; higher scores indicate better health status or quality of life)

Time frame
Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
3

Improvement in subjective symptoms (3)

Evaluation of reductions from baseline in patients' self-reported symptoms (using COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score) assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (range: 0-40; higher scores indicate worse health status or greater impact of COPD symptoms)

Time frame
Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
4

Improvement in objective assessment

Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' pulmonary function, specifically Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) measured in liters (L), at 12 months.

Time frame
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) measured in liters (L): 12 months from baseline

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Chungbuk National University Hospital

Lead sponsor

Trudell Medical International

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: