Comparing CPAP and BiPAP for Sleep-Disordered Breathing in People with Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorUniversity of British Columbia

About this trial

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries, with studies suggesting prevalence rates ranging from 27% to 62%. The condition often leads to daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and poor participation in rehabilitation. Positive airway pressure therapy can be used to treat the condition; however, some individuals find continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which applies the same pressure during inhalation and exhalation, difficult to use. Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) offers different pressures for inhalation and exhalation, which may be more comfortable and potentially improve adherence in this patient population. However, limited evidence compares CPAP and BiPAP in individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries.

This pilot study will enroll 32 adult participants with cervical spinal cord injuries who have moderate to severe SDB (defined as an AHI of 15 events/hour or greater). Participants will be randomly assigned to either CPAP or BiPAP therapy for 4 weeks. Device usage per night will be measured, and data on daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and sleep quality will be collected at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The investigators aim to determine whether BiPAP improves adherence and symptoms compared to CPAP in this patient population.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age >= 19 years

Cervical spinal cord injury (ASIA A, B, or C). This will include patients with upper (C1-C4) and lower (C5-C7) spinal cord injuries

Presence of sleep disordered breathing, defined as AHI > =15 events/hour by home sleep apnea test (HSAT)

Disqualifiers

On CPAP or BiPAP prior to spinal cord injury

Hypoventilation syndrome (elevated venous carbon dioxide, PvCO2>50 mm Hg)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • CPAP

    Device

    Participants randomized to this group will receive auto-CPAP therapy. The device will be initiated by a respiratory therapist at GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre. Settings will be adjusted to achieve a device efficacy index \< 5 events per hour.

  • BiPAP

    Device

    Participants will receive BiPAP S mode therapy for 4 weeks. The device will be initiated by a respiratory therapist at GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre with initial settings of IPAP 8 cmH2O and EPAP 3 cmH2O. Settings will be modified to a maximum tolerated level to achieve a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg ideal body weight and SpO2 \> 95%. Overnight oximetry will be performed to ensure at least 4 hours of device use, and settings will be adjusted to achieve a DEI \< 5 events per hour.

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: CPAP TherapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: BiPAP TherapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Adherence to PAP Therapy

Median hours of PAP device use per night, objectively measured via device download. Additional metrics include: % days used \>4 hrs/night, total # of days used, total # of hours used.

Time frame
4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Daytime Sleepiness

Measured using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). ESS is a self-administered questionnaire that asks participants to rate their likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in eight different situations that are common in daily life. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness.

Time frame
4 weeks
2

Sleep Quality

Measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over the past month. The PSQI yields seven component scores, each ranging from 0 to 3, which are summed to produce a global PSQI score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher global PSQI scores indicate poorer sleep quality.

Time frame
4 weeks
3

Fatigue

Measured using the PROMIS-Fatigue (PROMIS-F) scale. The PROMIS-F is a standardized, self-reported measure of fatigue. PROMIS-F T-scores are standardized to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate greater fatigue.

Time frame
4 weeks
4

PAP side effects

Assessed using a PAP therapy side effect survey. This survey will collect information about any side effects experienced by participants as a result of using the PAP devices.

Time frame
4 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: