Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound vs Surgical Gastrojejunostomy for Management of GOO.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAdventHealth

About this trial

The goal of this interventional study is to learn about the outcomes between two options for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

≥ 18 years of age.

Radiographic OR Endoscopic evidence of an obstructing neoplasm in the distal stomach or duodenum.

GOOSS of 0 or 1

BOTH surgical and endoscopic GJ are technically and clinically feasible

Disqualifiers

< 18 years of age

ECOG >2

Expected survival (determined by the treating oncologist) is less than 2 months.

Candidates for potential resection of the cancer and obstructed anatomical area (this includes patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Surgical gastrojejunostomy (S-GJ)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Surgical gastro-jejunostomy

  • EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Endoscopic Ultrasound guided gastro-jejunostomy

Treatment groups

70 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ)Other 1 intervention
Group B: Surgical gastrojejunostomy (S-GJ)Other 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Identify safety profile EUS-GJ

The severity of AEs will be determined using standard American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Lexicon and AGREE criteria (appendix) in the EUS-GJ group.

Time frame
24 Months

Secondary outcomes

1

Identify safety profile for S-GJ

The severity of AEs will be determined using Claviden-Dindo classification of surgical complications in the S-GJ group.

Time frame
24 Months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.