This study compares two methods used to measure how teeth come together (occlusal contacts) in patients who have natural teeth (dentate patients). The first method uses a modern jaw tracking device, while the second relies on the conventional mounting technique. The goal is to determine which method is more accurate for diagnosing bite alignment and contact points. This is a diagnostic test accuracy study, meaning it focuses on evaluating how well each technique performs in identifying the correct occlusal contacts.
None
None
Single group
Jaw Tracking Device
DeviceA jaw tracking device is a digital tool that records real-time jaw movements to accurately analyze occlusion and assist in virtual model mounting.
Accuracy of occlusal contact point detection as measured by comparing the contact points obtained from each mounting technique (jaw tracking device vs. conventional mounting) with the clinical intraoral occlusal contacts observed using articulating paper
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Omer Abdelmagid
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Sponsor institution
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options:
