About this trial
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and disability in older adults. Many people with knee OA believe that pain is primarily caused by joint damage or "wear and tear." These beliefs may contribute to fear of movement, reduced physical activity, and lower engagement in recommended self-management strategies. However, current evidence suggests that pain is influenced by multiple biological, psychological, and social factors and is not always directly related to the degree of structural joint changes visible on imaging.
Pain Science Education (PSE) is an educational approach designed to improve understanding of pain by explaining the complex factors that contribute to the pain experience. In contrast, traditional biomedical education focuses primarily on structural joint pathology as the source of symptoms. Although patient education is recommended as a first-line intervention for knee OA, little is known about whether PSE is more effective than biomedical education in changing beliefs, improving disease understanding, or influencing behavior and physiological responses in older adults with knee OA.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of PSE with standard biomedical education in community-dwelling older adults aged 55 years and older with knee OA. Eighty-two participants will be randomly allocated to receive either PSE or biomedical education through an interactive website-based educational platform.
The primary outcome is osteoarthritis conceptualization, assessed using the Osteoarthritis Conceptualization Questionnaire (OACQ). Secondary outcomes include physiological measures of nervous system functioning, including heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, eye-tracking measures, and temporal summation testing. The study will also assess movement behaviors using accelerometry, including sleep, sedentary behavior, and physical activity across a 24-hour day. Additional outcomes include self-efficacy, fear of movement, knee pain, physical function, well-being, exercise intentions, and intentions regarding knee replacement surgery.
Participants will complete baseline questionnaires and one week of physical activity monitoring before attending an in-person assessment. During the in-person visit, participants will complete physiological and sensory testing and review the educational materials assigned to their group. Participants will then complete a talk-aloud exercise to explore how they interpret and engage with the educational content. Following the visit, participants will complete a second week of physical activity monitoring and follow-up questionnaires.
The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving PSE will demonstrate greater improvements in OA conceptualization than those receiving biomedical education. Exploratory analyses will examine whether PSE is associated with differences in nervous system responses, movement behaviors, self-reported outcomes, and whether these effects differ according to sex and gender. Findings from this study may help inform evidence-based educational strategies for older adults living with knee OA.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Community-dwelling adults aged 55 years and older.
Self-reported diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis by a physician and/or fulfillment of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical criteria for knee osteoarthritis (activity-related joint pain and either no morning joint-related stiffness or morning stiffness lasting no longer than 30 minutes).
Able to provide informed consent.
Able to read and speak English.
Disqualifiers
Previous exposure to Pain Science Education (PSE), as determined by self-report.
Eyeglass prescription exceeding ±6 diopters for spherical correction and/or ±3 diopters for astigmatism, due to eye-tracking equipment requirements.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Pain Science Education
BehavioralParticipants receive a web-based Pain Science Education (PSE) intervention designed for older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The educational content presents contemporary concepts of pain using a biopsychosocial framework, emphasizing that pain is influenced by multiple biological, psychological, and social factors and is not always directly related to structural joint damage. Content includes images, myths and facts, disease-related concepts, and patient-provider statements encouraging physical activity and self-management.
Biomedical Education
BehavioralParticipants receive a web-based biomedical education intervention focused on structural and pathological aspects of knee osteoarthritis. The educational content emphasizes joint degeneration, cartilage loss, osteophytes, and other structural changes commonly described in traditional osteoarthritis education. Content includes images, myths and facts, disease-related concepts, and patient-provider statements focused on joint pathology and disease progression.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Osteoarthritis Conceptualization Questionnaire (OACQ) score
Osteoarthritis conceptualization assessed using the Osteoarthritis Conceptualization Questionnaire (OACQ). The OACQ measures participants' understanding and beliefs about osteoarthritis, pain, and physical activity. Higher scores indicate greater alignment with contemporary evidence-based concepts of osteoarthritis and pain.
Secondary outcomes
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Autonomic nervous system function assessed using heart rate variability derived from electrocardiogram recordings collected while participants interact with the educational material.
Electrodermal Activity (EDA)
Sympathetic nervous system activity assessed through continuous electrodermal activity recordings obtained while participants review the educational material.
Eye tracking
Visual attention and cognitive processing assessed using eye-tracking metrics, including gaze behavior (e.g. location and time spent on content) while participants review educational content.
Mechanical Temporal Summation
Central nervous system sensitivity assessed using mechanical temporal summation testing. Higher values indicate greater pain facilitation.
Other outcomes
Participant perceptions of educational content
The will be qualitatively evaluated using participants' interpretations, perceptions, and engagement with the educational materials explored through a structured talk-aloud exercise.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
McMaster University
Lead sponsor
The McMaster Institute for Research on Aging (MIRA)
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: