Comparing Standard of Care Biopsy System to a Novel Biopsy Needle System by Computational Pathologic Analysis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age18+
SponsorUro-1 Medical

About this trial

Prostate biopsy is the definitive examination to establish the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but up to 40% of these biopsies overestimate or underestimate the severity of the disease. A novel biopsy needle system captures substantially more tissue than standard of care needles, but it is important to assess the retrieval of tissue for pathologic analyses. This study will compare quality and quantity of tissue retrieved by both systems. Further, tissue will be analyzed using computational pathology algorithms for atypical small acinar proliferation and Gleason scores in terms of tissue area, tissue length, and tissue tortuosity.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult males with PSA density greater than or equal to 0.15

Lesions are visible under MRI

PIRADS score is greater than or equal to 3

Able to and willing to provide consent

Disqualifiers

Subject has had previous local prostate therapy, focal therapy, brachytherapy, ADT, surgery, or chemotherapy for prostate cancer

History of dementia, cognitive impairment, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT)

Is a prisoner currently or has a history of incarceration

Unable to understand English

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Novel needle biopsy catheter (test)

    Device

    Tissue is collected from the prostate by introducing a needle into the prostate and cutting out a sample

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Test groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Single ArmActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation

Presence of suspicious prostate gland cells that appear cancerous but are not definitive enough to diagnose cancer

Time frame
From enrollment to end of treatment at 1 day
2

Gleason Score

Pathologist scores the biopsy sample for the percentage of samples with a Gleason score of 7, 8, 9 or 10.

Time frame
From enrollment to end of treatment at 1 day
3

Tissue area and length

The amount of tissue retrieved by either biopsy systems-- area and length-- will be measured using computational pathology and compared

Time frame
From treatment to end of pathology review at 2 days
4

Tissue toruosity

Tortuosity will be ranked from Tier 1 (high quality) to Tier 4 (low quality) using the computational pathology algorithm.

Time frame
From treatment to end of pathology review at 2 days

Secondary outcomes

1

Standard Pathology versus Computational Pathology Results

Tissue samples will be analyzed by standard pathology techniques and computational pathology and differences in values of diagnosis, Gleason score, percent tumor volume, presence of cribiform glands, and perineural invasion compared

Time frame
From treatment to end of pathology review at 2 days

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Uro-1 Medical

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Collaborator

NYU Langone Health

Collaborator

Novant Health, Inc.

Collaborator