Comparing Suture vs. Combined Closure Strategies for Large Blood Vessel Access in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two strategies for closing the main artery access site in adult patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) through a blood vessel in the leg (transfemoral access).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does using a single suture device lower the rate of access-related vascular complications compared to using a hybrid combination of a suture device and a plug-based closure device? How do the two closure strategies compare regarding bleeding complications, procedure time, and time to complete vessel sealing?

Researchers will compare a single-suture closure strategy to a hybrid closure strategy (one suture plus one plug-based device) to see if using a single suture reduces vessel-related complications and improves patient safety after TAVI.

Participants will:

Undergo standard pre-procedure screening and TAVI via the main artery in the leg as part of routine medical care.

Receive an initial single-suture placement before the large TAVI delivery system is inserted.

Be evaluated after sheath removal for initial bleeding control; qualifying participants will then be randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive no additional device (single suture group) or receive a plug-based closure device (hybrid group).

Have their heart and access site monitored during hospitalization, including laboratory checks and imaging prior to discharge.

Complete a 72-hour safety and complication evaluation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient is at least 18 years of age at the time of screening.

Patient is scheduled to undergo elective transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via transfemoral arterial access.

Patient is deemed suitable for transfemoral TAVI and large-bore vascular access closure by the local Heart Team.

Patient (or legally authorized representative) provides written informed consent prior to initiating any study-related procedures.

Disqualifiers

Planned TAVI procedure via non-femoral arterial access (e.g., transapical, transaortic, subclavian/axillary, or carotid access).

Emergency or non-elective TAVI procedure.

Target main femoral artery vessel diameter, calcification, or tortuosity judged unsuitable for standard percutaneous large-bore vascular closure device deployment.

Known active, unresolved local or systemic infection at the planned vascular access site.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Single Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device

    Device

    Transfemoral large-bore access site closure using a single pre-placed suture-based vascular closure device (Perclose ProGlide or Perclose ProStyle). The device is deployed at the beginning of the TAVI procedure prior to sheath insertion according to standard manufacturer instructions. Following procedure completion and main sheath removal, the single suture is tied down over a guide wire. Haemostasis is assessed immediately (Grade H0: dry/no bleeding, or Grade H1: minor oozing/bleeding controllable with manual compression). Final haemostasis is achieved via manual compression without additional plug adjuncts.

  • Extravascular Collagen Plug-Based Closure Device

    Device

    Adjunctive deployment of an extravascular collagen plug-based vascular closure device (Angio-Seal 6F or 8F) following primary single-suture pre-placement. In patients achieving intra-operative Grade H0 (dry) or Grade H1 (minor oozing) haemostasis after primary suture tie-down, the Angio-Seal device is deployed over the retained safety guide wire into the common femoral artery access site to provide secondary extravascular mechanical sealing.

Treatment groups

705 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Single-Suture StrategyActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Hybrid Strategy (Suture + Plug)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Access Site-Related Vascular Complications

Composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications, defined and adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria.

Time frame
30 days post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Access Site-Related Bleeding Events

Incidence of access site-related bleeding events classified as Type 1 (minor), Type 2 (major), Type 3 (life-threatening), or Type 4 (fatal) according to VARC-3 criteria.

Time frame
30 days post-procedure
2

Technical and Procedural Success of Vascular Closure

Rate of successful access site haemostasis achieved with the primary allocated device strategy without requiring unplanned surgical intervention, covered stent implantation, or secondary bailout vascular closure device.

Time frame
Intra-procedure
3

Time to Access Site Haemostasis

Time (in minutes) measured from main sheath removal to the complete cessation of access site bleeding (Grade H0).

Time frame
Intra-procedure
4

All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality

Rates of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality according to VARC-3 definitions.

Time frame
30 days post-procedure

Other outcomes

1

Femoral Vascular Access Site Sequelae by Duplex Ultrasound

Rate of structural femoral artery abnormalities assessed via Doppler/Duplex ultrasound, including false aneurysm (pseudoaneurysm), arteriovenous fistula, vessel stenosis (\>50%), or acute vessel occlusion.

Time frame
30 days post-procedure
2

Post-Procedural Length of Stay

Number of days from the index TAVI procedure to discharge from the hospital.

Time frame
Up to 30 days post-procedure

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Zürich

Collaborator

University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen

Collaborator

University Hospital Giessen and Marburg

Collaborator

University Hospital Galway

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: