About this trial
The purpose of this study is to compare two approaches for monitoring pancreatic cysts as well as to identify associated biomarkers. The study doctors want to compare more frequent monitoring versus less frequent monitoring as well as identify biomarkers which may improve risk detection of transformation to pancreatic cancer. The study doctors want to learn which monitoring method and which biomarkers lead to better outcomes for patients.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patient must be ≥ 50 years and ≤ 75 years of age
Patient must not have acute pancreatitis or a history of chronic pancreatitis
Patient must have received a CT, MRI, or EUS within 6 months prior to enrollment that revealed one or more ≥ 1 cm pancreatic cyst(s).
Patients of childbearing potential must not be known to be pregnant
Disqualifiers
None
Trial population
Patients with pancreatic cysts.
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Biopsy Procedure
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo biopsy
Biospecimen Collection
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo blood sample collection
Computed Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo CT
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo EUS
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo EUS-FNA
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo MRI
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other interventionAncillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Questionnaire Administration
Other interventionAncillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Surgical Procedure
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo surgery
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Time-to-finding of a worrisome feature and/or high-risk stigmata on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Will assess the predictive performance of both primary markers separately. Time to first occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata will be measured from the time of baseline blood draw. Will use an overall significance level of 0.1. Will use a Bonferroni correction for multiplicity adjustment, the significance level applied to both primary biomarkers will be 0.05. Will evaluate using a two-sided log-rank test comparing time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata between the marker-positive and marker-negative subgroups. Will visually summarize time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata in both maker positive and marker negative using Kaplan-Meier curves. All biomarkers will come in with a predetermined threshold for determining marker positivity (as defined in their respective publications). The primary imaging marker is for MRI, the analysis of this biomarker will be restricted to participants with a pre-enrollment MRI.
Occurrence of an "unfavorable" outcome (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Defined as a composite of: (1) any pancreatic cancer without surgery; (2) unresectable pancreatic cancer or cancer \> T1a, N0 at surgery, and (3) benign disease at surgery will be approached from the intent-to-treat perspective. Time to the first occurrence of the primary endpoint will be measured from randomization. Survival analysis methods will be used to estimate and compare distributions of time to an unfavorable event between the study arms. In particular Kaplan-Meier estimates will be developed for each arm and a log rank test will be used to compare the two arms.
Secondary outcomes
Finding of a worrisome feature and/or high-risk stigmata on CT or MRI
Will evaluate with the analog analysis plan.
Situational anxiety
Will be measured using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety 4-item short form. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare situational anxiety between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Overall quality of life
Will be measured using the PROMIS-10. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare quality of life between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Financial distress
Will be measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity measure. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. Will compare financial distress between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Other outcomes
Predictive accuracy of radiomic markers for dysplasia and pancreatic cancer (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of known and future radiomic markers for dysplasia and pancreatic cancer.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Collaborator