Comparing the Clinical Impact of Pancreatic Cyst Surveillance Programs and Associated Biomarkers

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age50-75
SponsorECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to compare two approaches for monitoring pancreatic cysts as well as to identify associated biomarkers. The study doctors want to compare more frequent monitoring versus less frequent monitoring as well as identify biomarkers which may improve risk detection of transformation to pancreatic cancer. The study doctors want to learn which monitoring method and which biomarkers lead to better outcomes for patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient must be ≥ 50 years and ≤ 75 years of age

Patient must not have acute pancreatitis or a history of chronic pancreatitis

Patient must have received a CT, MRI, or EUS within 6 months prior to enrollment that revealed one or more ≥ 1 cm pancreatic cyst(s).

Patients of childbearing potential must not be known to be pregnant

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

Patients with pancreatic cysts.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biopsy Procedure

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo biopsy

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Endoscopic Ultrasound

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo EUS

  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo EUS-FNA

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Quality-of-Life Assessment

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)

  • Questionnaire Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)

  • Surgical Procedure

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo surgery

Treatment groups

770 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Arm A (low intensity surveillance)8 interventions
Group B: Arm B (high intensity surveillance)8 interventions
Group C: Observational7 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Time-to-finding of a worrisome feature and/or high-risk stigmata on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Will assess the predictive performance of both primary markers separately. Time to first occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata will be measured from the time of baseline blood draw. Will use an overall significance level of 0.1. Will use a Bonferroni correction for multiplicity adjustment, the significance level applied to both primary biomarkers will be 0.05. Will evaluate using a two-sided log-rank test comparing time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata between the marker-positive and marker-negative subgroups. Will visually summarize time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata in both maker positive and marker negative using Kaplan-Meier curves. All biomarkers will come in with a predetermined threshold for determining marker positivity (as defined in their respective publications). The primary imaging marker is for MRI, the analysis of this biomarker will be restricted to participants with a pre-enrollment MRI.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
2

Occurrence of an "unfavorable" outcome (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)

Defined as a composite of: (1) any pancreatic cancer without surgery; (2) unresectable pancreatic cancer or cancer \> T1a, N0 at surgery, and (3) benign disease at surgery will be approached from the intent-to-treat perspective. Time to the first occurrence of the primary endpoint will be measured from randomization. Survival analysis methods will be used to estimate and compare distributions of time to an unfavorable event between the study arms. In particular Kaplan-Meier estimates will be developed for each arm and a log rank test will be used to compare the two arms.

Time frame
Up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Finding of a worrisome feature and/or high-risk stigmata on CT or MRI

Will evaluate with the analog analysis plan.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
2

Situational anxiety

Will be measured using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety 4-item short form. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare situational anxiety between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
3

Overall quality of life

Will be measured using the PROMIS-10. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare quality of life between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
4

Financial distress

Will be measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity measure. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. Will compare financial distress between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.

Time frame
Up to 5 years

Other outcomes

1

Predictive accuracy of radiomic markers for dysplasia and pancreatic cancer (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)

Will evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of known and future radiomic markers for dysplasia and pancreatic cancer.

Time frame
Up to 5 years

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator