Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-50
SponsorIbadat International University, Islamabad

About this trial

objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks

Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg

Positive Slump Test

Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45°

Disqualifiers

BMI < 20 kg/m² or > 30 kg/m²

Previous history of spinal surgery

Presence of red flags (significant motor/sensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel/bladder dysfunction)

Peripheral neuropathy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Slider Neurodynamic Technique Group

    Other intervention

    will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.

  • Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique Group

    Other intervention

    will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Slider Neurodynamic Technique GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique GroupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Pain intensity

will be measured using VAS

Time frame
Baseline to Week 8
2

Functional disability

measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Time frame
Baseline to week 8

Secondary outcomes

1

Hip range of motion

assessed using Goniometer

Time frame
Baseline to week 8
2

Lumbar flexion Range of Motion

measured using Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST)

Time frame
Baseline to Week 8

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.