About this trial
Our goal is to compare two types of advance directives forms available in English and Spanish to determine which is more easy to use for patients.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Over 18 years of age
Disqualifiers
Under 18
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Randomized clinical study
Other interventionParticipants will be randomly assigned to one of two advance directives and we will assess which they prefer. This is not a human health intervention
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Ease of use of Questionnaire. more patient-centered and family oriented
It was easy to read and understand the form of advance directive .◦This is a feasibility trail. On completion of the advance directive they were assigned ( letter directive or traditional directive, we are asking questions to participants about whether the directive was clear and easy to understand).
Secondary outcomes
Ease of use to describe how decisions are made
Advance form helped me to describe how decisions are made
Ease of use about the type of treatment and care.
Advance form stimulated my own thinking about the type of treatment and care they wish to receive in my last days of life.
Ease of use about letting my doctors about my wishes.
This form can help my doctors understand what treatments would like to receive and what not wish to receive in my last days of life ( resuscitation , respirators , artificial feeding , renal dialysis).
Ease of use if I cannot make decisions for myself then the form says it.
In the future, if I can not make decisions for myself, this form will help my family / friends understand exactly what treatments ( resuscitation , respirators , artificial feeding , renal dialysis) would like to receive and what treatments do not wish to receive so they can make decisions medical for me.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.