Comparison of Catheter Plus Marshall Vein Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation Alone in Persistent AF With Heart Failure

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

About this trial

This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of combining catheter ablation with Marshall vein ethanol ablation versus catheter ablation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant heart failure. Persistent AF is a common arrhythmia that significantly impacts the quality of life and survival rates, especially when coexisting with heart failure. While catheter ablation is a standard treatment for AF, its effectiveness in persistent AF, particularly in patients with heart failure, remains suboptimal. The addition of Marshall vein ethanol ablation may enhance treatment outcomes by targeting arrhythmogenic substrates. This study will enroll 120 participants across three centers to evaluate whether this combined approach can reduce AF recurrence, improve heart function, and enhance patient outcomes compared to catheter ablation alone.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age between 18 and 80 years

For symptomatic patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: At least a 6-month history of atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrillation duration exceeding 7 days without spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm; at least two episodes of persistent atrial fibrillation in the past 6 months even after rhythm conversion; poor tolerance or resistance to at least one Class I, II, or III antiarrhythmic drug

Diagnosed with heart failure: Echocardiogram showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%

Patient willing to receive medication or surgical treatment

Disqualifiers

Presence of thrombus in the left atrium

Left atrial diameter greater than 65 millimeters in the parasternal long-axis view, or left atrial volume exceeding 200 milliliters as measured by MRI or CT

Presence of significant congenital abnormalities or medical issues, deemed by the researcher as inappropriate for participation in the study

Reversible causes of atrial fibrillation, such as pericarditis, thyroid disease, acute alcohol intoxication, recent major surgery, or trauma

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Catheter Ablation Combined with Marshall Vein Ethanol Ablation

    Procedure/Surgery

    This study involves two procedures. The first procedure is a combination of catheter ablation with ethanol ablation of the Marshall vein. The second procedure is catheter ablation alone. Both procedures involve standard techniques used to treat persistent atrial fibrillation, with the addition of Marshall vein ethanol ablation in the experimental group aimed at potentially improving outcomes by targeting additional arrhythmogenic substrates.

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Catheter ablation combined with Marshall vein ethanol ablation groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Catheter ablation alone groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AT/AF) Recurrence

The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who remain free from clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) at follow-up. Recurrence is defined as the absence of documented AF/AFL episodes lasting 30 seconds or more during continuous ECG monitoring over a 1-month period.

Time frame
12 months after the procedure
2

Change in NT-proBNP Levels

This outcome measures the change in NT-proBNP levels, a biomarker for heart failure, from baseline to follow-up, indicating the impact of the intervention on heart failure status.

Time frame
12 months after the procedure
3

Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

This outcome assesses the change in LVEF as measured by echocardiography, reflecting the effect of the intervention on cardiac function.

Time frame
12 months after the procedure
4

Change in 6-Minute Walk Test Distance

This outcome measures the change in the distance covered during the 6-minute walk test, an indicator of functional capacity and exercise tolerance.

Time frame
12 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Presence or Absence of Arrhythmias Within 30 Days

This outcome measures whether arrhythmias related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.

Time frame
30 days after the procedure
2

Presence or Absence of Chest Tightness Within 30 Days

This outcome measures whether chest tightness related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.

Time frame
30 days after the procedure
3

Presence or Absence of Palpitations Within 30 Days

This outcome measures whether palpitations related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.

Time frame
30 days after the procedure
4

Presence or Absence of Bleeding Within 30 Days

This outcome measures whether bleeding related to the procedure occurred within 30 days post-intervention.

Time frame
30 days after the procedure

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.