Comparison of Double-tract and Tubular Gastric Anastomosis in Proximal Gastric Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong University

About this trial

This study includes patients diagnosed with proximal gastric cancer (Siewert type II/III, cT1-3N0-1M0) across six tertiary hospitals, who underwent either double-tract reconstruction (DTR) or tubular gastric anastomosis (TGA). Participants were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure. We conducted a comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes by evaluating electronic medical records, postoperative gastroscopy, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and relevant rating scales.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma by biopsy

Carcinoma of the upper gastric body or Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), with a clinical stage of cT1-3N0-1M0

Age 18-75 years, with a performance status (PS) score of 0-2

Candidates for planned surgical resection, eligible for either double-tract reconstruction or tubular gastric anastomosis based on preoperative assessment

Disqualifiers

Presence of other malignant tumors or severe chronic diseases (e.g., severe diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, decompensated cirrhosis, etc.)

Preoperative endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus

Severe preoperative malnutrition (albumin <30 g/L, prealbumin <150 mg/L)

History of prior upper abdominal surgery, gastrointestinal malformation, or psychiatric disorders

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Double-tract reconstruction

    Procedure/Surgery

    Patients underwent double-tract reconstruction after radical proximal gastrectomy

Treatment groups

52 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: DTR GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: TGA GroupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis

The diagnosis of reflux esophagitis was based on symptoms, endoscopic findings, and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Time frame
6 month after surgery
2

Severity of reflux esophagitis

According to the diagnostic and grading criteria for reflux esophagitis, patients were classified into four categories: no reflux esophagitis, mild (LA-A/B), moderate (LA-C), and severe (LA-D).

Time frame
6 month after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Postoperative nutritional recovery

The body weight change rate at different postoperative time points compared with preoperative levels, along with albumin, prealbumin, and hemoglobin levels, were comprehensively considered in the assessment of postoperative nutritional status.

Time frame
1 year after surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.