COMPARISON OF ERECTOR SPINA PLAN BLOCK AND THORACIC PARAVERTEBRAL BLOCK FOR PERIOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorSaglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

About this trial

The primary aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block with erector spinae plane block, which we use in thoracotomy surgeries. Secondary aims were to compare these groups in terms of Riker Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores, postoperative complications, postoperative opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients who will undergo thoracotomy and are between the ages of 18-65

have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk classification I-II will be included in the study.

Disqualifiers

Patients who did not agree to participate in the study,

had an infection in the application area,

had coagulopathy,

were morbidly obese (Body mass index (BMI)>35),

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block admistring

    Procedure/Surgery

    In the ESPB group, the probe was placed longitudinally at the level of the T5 transverse process, 2-3 cm lateral from the midline. The muscles were visualized superior to the transverse process ; then, the needle was inserted in the craniocaudal direction using the in-plane technique. A dose of 2 mL normal saline were injected into the two layers of the interfacial area under the erector spinae muscle, and the proper injection site was confirmed. After visualizing the linear spread of saline in the fascial plane, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected there for the block.

  • Thoracic Paravertebral Block administring

    Procedure/Surgery

    In the TPVB group, the probe was placed 2-3 cm laterally and vertically of the T5 spinous process. Once the transverse process, corresponding paravertebral space, internal intercostal membrane, and pleura was identified , the needle was inserted in the lateromedial direction using the in-plane technique. After confirmation of pleural displacement with 2 mL saline, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered for the block.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Erektor spina plan blockActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Toracik paravertebral blockActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Numeric Rating Scale

They will be numbered from 1 to 10. If reporting a score on a scale, please include the unabbreviated scale title, the minimum and maximum values, and whether higher scores mean a better or worse outcome.

Time frame
Post-operative 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

1

Riker Agitation and Sedation Scale

7 Dangerous Agitation ... If reporting a score on a scale, please include the unabbreviated scale title, the minimum and maximum values, and whether higher scores mean a better or worse outcome.

Time frame
Immediately after extubation
2

Patient satisfaction score:

Patients' satisfaction with the quality of pain management will be assessed on the second postoperative day using the following scale: 1 = very dissatisfied; 2 = quite dissatisfied; 3 = moderate; 4 = quite satisfactory; 5 = very satisfactory.)

Time frame
Post-operative 30 minutes
3

24-hour Tramadol usage:

Amount of Tramadol used per 24 hours

Time frame
posoperative 24 hours

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: